January 26, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 26

Advertisement

January 26, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 25, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 24, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

California's New Law Prohibits Discrimination Against Employees For Off-The-Clock Use Of Cannabis

California first legalized medical marijuana in 1996 and adult use or recreational marijuana in 2016. Since then, 39 states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana; 19 states have legalized adult marijuana use and other states, including Connecticut, Illinois, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island, have introduced laws that aim to protect employees who use marijuana off-premises and while off-duty.  Until now, California law did not protect marijuana users from adverse employment action based on their marijuana use. 

Recently signed California Assembly Bill 2188 (AB 2188) (effective January 1, 2024) prohibits employers from making employment decisions based on whether the employee uses cannabis while off-duty (i.e., not on employer property and not while working a shift). Specifically, employers are now prohibited from (1) refusing to hire an individual because of that person’s medical marijuana status, or (2) terminating an employee when the employer learns that the employee used cannabis on the employee’s day off.   The law does not apply to (1) employees in the building and construction trades; (2) applicants and employees that are required to undergo a federal background investigation or security clearance; or (3) applicants and employees who must be drug tested as a condition of employment, receiving federal funding or licensing or entering into a federal contract. 

So, can California employers still drug test?  Yes, but with important caveats. First, the law permits “scientifically valid pre-employment drug screening conducted through methods that do not screen for non-psychoactive cannabis metabolites.”  Adverse actions based on those tests are permissible.  Second, current drug tests do not show whether an applicant or employee is currently impaired.  Instead, most standard drug tests merely detect the presence of non-psychoactive cannabis metabolites, which can linger in the body for weeks.  Again, AB 2188 makes an individual’s off-duty usage off-limits for nearly all considerations, and as a result, contemporaneous observations of the employee’s impairment at the time (or around the time) of testing are critical. 

An applicant or employee is entitled to the full remedies of California’s anti-discrimination law – compensatory and punitive damages, hiring, reinstatement, or promotion, and attorney’s fees. 

In light of this new law and the potential repercussions and penalties, employers should review their current policies and procedures to ensure compliance with these new protections (including that off-duty marijuana use is now a protected classification).  Employers should train managers and supervisors on how to observe and detect potential impairment as such observations will be critical to combat an employee's claim that their cannabis use was off-the-clock.  Companies are encouraged to consult with counsel to ensure their drug testing procedures and practices are in line with AB 2188 by January 1, 2024.

AB 2188 by Assemblymember Bill Quirk (D-Hayward) protects Californians from employment discrimination based on their use of cannabis off-the-clock and away from the workplace.

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2022/09/18/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-to-strengthen-californias-cannabis-laws/

©1994-2023 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 290
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Associate

Delaney's work primarily involves litigation and counseling on federal and state employment matters before federal and state courts and administrative agencies against individual and class action claims of discrimination, sexual misconduct, harassment, and wage and hour violations. Her clients have included Fortune 500 companies, insurance companies, prominent medical providers, manufacturers, and luxury fitness facilities.

In addition, in her practice Delaney advises and collaborates with clients to ensure their compliance with anti-harassment...

617.348.1837
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement