May 28, 2022

Volume XII, Number 148

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 25, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

California to Shore up Already-Robust Plastic Bag Enforcement

California’s tough plastic-labeling enforcement is about to get a little stricter.

In late 2021, the California Statewide Commission on Recycling Markets and Curbside Recycling asked the state’s Attorney General, Rob Bonta, and the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to crack down on inappropriate use of recycling symbols on plastic bags, including the “chasing arrows” logo and the words “recycle” and “recyclable.” According to the Commission, confused California consumers place these mislabeled bags out for curbside collection, which forces recycling companies to spend time pulling these soft plastics out of the waste stream or fixing jammed machines.

As it stands, California’s Proposition 67 prohibits single-use plastic bags, with one exception: retailers may sell plastic bags for 10 cents, as long as these bags are capable of recycling in the state. The Commission’s letter alleges that current state recycling programs cannot handle the types of bags some retailers are using, and is requesting shored-up enforcement. The Commission also asked enforcers to look into whether retailers are deceiving consumers by telling them that their bags and plastic films can be returned to participating stores for recycling—and then failing to recycle returned material.

Enforcement in the state on this issue is already robust. Over the past few years, California enforcers released a barrage of settlements with online and brick-and-mortar retailers over the use of terms like “biodegradable” for plastic products. Investigations into plastic labeling will only increase in the future, owing both to the Commission’s letter and new environmental legislation set to take effect in a few years that would forbid the use of the word “recyclable” or the chasing arrows symbol unless the labeled product is, in reality, possible to recycle in California.

Retailers should be prepared for government inquiries into how their plastic bags are labeled, and where and how these items can be recycled. 

Copyright © 2022, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 24
Advertisement

About this Author

Phyllis H. Marcus Partner Consumer Products Food Industry Retail Practices
Partner

With 17 years of experience at the FTC, Phyllis brings a unique advertising and children’s privacy vantage point to our clients.

Phyllis heads the firm’s advertising counseling practice, and focuses on all aspects of advertising, from the initial development of a claim to its ultimate defense in the marketplace. Phyllis’s practice includes claim creation and substantiation, pre-acquisition due diligence, dissemination in traditional and digital media, and both offensive and defensive competitor challenges. She also counsels clients on the intricacies of compliance with the Children’...

202-955-1810
Kelly R. Oeltjenbruns Complex Commercial Litigation Hunton Andrews Kurth Washington, DC
Associate

Kelly’s practice focuses on class action, consumer protection and other complex commercial litigation.

Kelly recently finished a term as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Roger Wollman in the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. A member of the litigation and issues and appeals teams, she represents clients in a wide range of litigation matters including those involving Title IX, antitrust, and privacy and consumer law. She has multidistrict litigation experience and assists clients in various stages of litigation, including motions practice, discovery and...

202-419-2126
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement