August 15, 2022

Volume XII, Number 227

Advertisement
Advertisement

August 12, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

CFPB Rescinds Special Regulatory Treatment for EWA Company

On June 30, the CFPB issued an order terminating an EWA provider’s Sandbox Approval Order relating to its earned wage access products. In December 2020, the CFPB provided the company special regulatory treatment, including a temporary safe harbor from liability under TILA/Reg. Z because, in part, the EWA program did not involve the offering or extension of “credit” as defined by Reg. Z. In its press release, the CFPB note that the “temporary safe harbor is for offering and providing certain earned wage access products, subject to good faith compliance with the terms of the approval order.”

According to the Bureau, the CFPB informed the company on June 3, 2022, that it was considering terminating the approval order in light of certain public statements the company made wrongly suggesting a CFPB endorsement of its products. On June 21, 2022, the company notified the CFPB that it was planning to modify its earned wage access product fee model. The CFPB notes that the 2020 approval order only applies to the company’s existing products and any changes to the product fee model would require modification to the order. The company instead requested termination of the order so it could make fee model changes quickly and flexibly.

Putting It Into Practice: In its announcement, the CFPB states that it has received requests for clarification regarding its November 2020 advisory opinion on EWA products. In January 22, the CFPB General Counsel indicated that more clarity on EWA products was needed from the CFPB in response to consumer groups arguing that the opinion was being misused as justification for illegal EWA products (we discussed this in a previous blog post here). The CFPB plans to issue further guidance soon to provide greater clarity concerning the application of the definition of “credit” under TILA/Reg. Z. In light of these developments, it is possible that the CFPB will revise or rescind the 2020 Advisory Opinion, and, as such, EWA providers should prepare for greater regulatory scrutiny.

Copyright © 2022, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 188
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Moorari Shah Bankruptcy Lawyer Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Partner

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles and San Francisco offices. 

Areas of Practice

Moorari combines deep in-house and law firm experience to deliver practical, business-minded legal advice. He represents banks, fintechs, mortgage companies, auto lenders, and other nonbank institutions in transactional, licensing, regulatory compliance, and government enforcement matters covering mergers and acquisitions, consumer and commercial lending, equipment finance and leasing, and supervisory examinations,...

213-617-4171
A.J. S. Dhaliwal Bankruptcy Attorney Sheppard Mullin Washington DC
Associate

A.J. is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm's Washington, D.C. office. 

A.J. has over a decade of experience helping banks, non-bank financial institutions, and other companies providing financial products and services in a wide range of matters including government enforcement actions, civil litigation, regulatory examinations, and internal investigations.

With a diversified regulatory, compliance, and enforcement background, A.J. counsels financial institutions in matters involving...

202-747-2323
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement