October 20, 2020

Volume X, Number 294

October 19, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Coronavirus: Are Spectator Bans the Worst Case Scenario for Brand Sponsors?

On Wednesday, amid growing concern over the spread of  Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19” or “coronavirus”), the Italian government announced that all sporting events in Italy will resume.  The catch?  They will all take place behind closed doors—no spectators will be allowed to attend for at least the next month.

Italy, as the epicenter of Europe’s coronavirus outbreak, previously undertook drastic measures to slow the virus’ spread—closing all schools in the country, cancelling sporting events, and instituting bans on other public gatherings across the country.

While the epidemic has not yet reached similar proportions in the US, the virus’ spread has also not shown any sign of slowing down.  Could similar measures be taken in the US?  If so, what does this mean for event organizers and brand sponsors?

Brands pay big bucks—in some cases hundreds of millions of dollars—to sponsor high profile sporting, entertainment, and cultural events. What are the repercussions if event organizers are forced to cancel sponsored events because of the coronavirus outbreak?  Does the analysis change if the events go on as scheduled, but spectators are banned from attending?

Force Majeure

Some event organizers are asserting that the outbreak constitutes a force majeure event or gives rise to another legal basis excusing nonperformance under sponsorship agreements.

  • Any assertion of force majeure must be analyzed under the terms of the sponsorship agreement, which may or may not contain an explicit clause

  • Where a force majeure clause contains enumerated examples, as opposed to a general provision, then a court will typically find that only those events specifically listed are sufficient to excuse performance

  • To the extent the clause also includes a catchall provision, courts will generally limit it to include occurrences of the same nature as those enumerated

  • In light of recent outbreaks of SARS, Zika, and Ebola, it is unclear if force majeure clauses will cover coronavirus if “disease,” “epidemic,” or similar language is not listed

Based on the foregoing, a sponsor may argue that the coronavirus does not fall within the parameters of the force majeure clause, performance is not excused, and any nonperformance (event cancellation) by the event organizer constitutes breach.

Even if coronavirus is deemed to fall within the parameters of a force majeure clause, the general rules of contract will apply to excuse at least a portion of the sponsor’s contractual obligations.  That is, if an event is cancelled, the sponsor should be excused from its duty to pay—at least as to the portion of the payment that was due for the cancelled event.

What if the event is not cancelled and instead—like what is happening in Italy—spectators are banned from attending?  If the event goes on as scheduled, there is no reason for the event organizer to invoke the force majeure clause to excuse performance.

Yet, from the sponsor’s perspective, the sponsor will not receive the benefit of the bargain because there will be no eyes on the brand marketing.  Is this the worst case scenario for brands?

There may be another alternative.

Frustration of Purpose and Commercial Impracticability

Frustration of purpose occurs where an unforeseen event, not caused by either party, radically changes the circumstances surrounding the agreement so that performance of the contract is significantly different than the parties initially intended.

Commercial impracticability is where performance of the contract is still possible but due to a change in circumstances, the performance of one party’s obligations has become economically senseless.

  • Like force majeure, these doctrines are very narrow and usually limited to where a virtually cataclysmic, wholly unforeseeable event makes the contract worthless to a party

  • Like the analysis discussed above for force majeure, in light of recent epidemics around the world, it is hard to say that coronavirus is “wholly unforeseeable”

Nevertheless, a brand sponsor may assert that, even though the event continued as scheduled, the contract was virtually worthless.  The entire rationale for event sponsorship is to create brand awareness with meaningful real-time interaction—a cause impossible to achieve with no attendance.

What Parties Can Do Right Now

During this period of uncertainty, companies should take the time to ensure they have adequate protections in place for the worst case scenario.

Our attorneys are currently actively engaged with our clients to promptly analyze their rights and obligations under various agreements, and applicable law including:

  • reviewing key provisions of the sponsorship agreement, such as: representations, warranties, termination rights, insurance provisions, force majeure clauses, and make-good rights;

  • proactively engaging with co-parties to understand their positions and work with them to develop alternative means to perform contractual obligations; and

  • considering second order and third order effects: does cancellation of the event affect the brand’s/organizer’s ability to perform its obligations under other agreements?

How Parties Can Protect Themselves in the Future

  • Event organizers should make sure that the contract allows them to cancel an event in these situations. Specifically, they should ensure the force majeure clause is specific enough to cover disease outbreaks

  • Sponsors should make sure the contract provides for meaningful remedies if the event is cancelled. Further, include a provision obligating the organizer to provide an alternative benefit such as refunding a portion of the fees, or offering replacement sponsorship benefits where the event is not cancelled, but the sponsor chooses not to participate due to a situation like this.

Copyright © 2020, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 66

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Brian D. Anderson, Intellectual Property, Attorney, Sheppard Mullin, Law firm
Associate

Brian D. Anderson is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in Sheppard Mullin's San Francisco and Palo Alto offices. He is a member of the Entertainment, Media, and Technology Industry Team.

Areas of Practice

Brian enjoys a broad intellectual property and commercial transactions, corporate, advertising and privacy and data security practice.

He focuses his practice on structuring and negotiating intellectual property and technology deals, such as...

415-774-3287
Brittany Walter Intellectual property Attorney Sheppard Mullin Law Firm San Francisco

Brittany Walter is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm's San Francisco office. She is a member of the Privacy and Cybersecurity Team, the Advertising Team and the Technology Transactions Team.

Areas of Practice

Brittany’s practice focuses on protecting her clients’ intellectual property rights through counseling, prosecution, enforcement and litigation.

Prosecution and Enforcement. Brittany assists with matters before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). Brittany’s experience includes trademark prosecution as well as protecting her clients’ brands in trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings before the TTAB.

Litigation. Brittany enforces and defends her clients’ rights in complex commercial litigation involving trademark, copyright, false advertising, unfair competition and contract disputes. She has experience in pre-litigation analysis, managing fact discovery, expert discovery, deposition preparations, preparing witnesses for depositions and trial, and drafting motions.

Advertising. Brittany advises clients in conducting advertising campaigns, contests and sweepstakes, and brand marketing campaigns.

Technology and Commercial Transactions. Brittany drafts and negotiates agreements for commercial and transactional matters.

Privacy and Data Protection. Brittany counsels clients on compliance with domestic and international privacy laws and regulations. She helps clients with drafting privacy policies and online terms of servicer for websites and mobile applications. She also counsels clients regarding cybersecurity breach response and best practices for mitigation.

415.774.2973
Genevieve Perez, Sheppard Mullin Law Firm, Emtertainment and Digital Media Attorney
Associate

Genevieve Perez is an associate in the Entertainment and Digital Media Practice Group in the firm's New York office. Genevieve’s practice focuses on transactional matters in the entertainment, technology, media, fashion and advertising fields.

212-653-8700