January 20, 2021

Volume XI, Number 20

Advertisement

January 19, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 18, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Court Holds No "Continuous Director" Status Required Under Nonprofit Law

The California Supreme Court has imposed a continuous ownership requirement for shareholder derivative suits under California Corporations Code Section 800.  Grosset v. Wenaas, 42 Cal. 4th 1100 (2008).  Thus, a shareholder must maintain continuous share ownership throughout the litigation of a derivative action.  The Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law includes several provisions authorizing suits by a director (Cal. Corp. Code §§ 5223, 5233 & 5142).  If a director files a lawsuit under one of these statutes and then leaves the board, does that director lose "standing"?  In other words, do these statutes impose an analogous "continuous directorship" requirement?

According to the Second District Court of Appeal, the answer is "no".   Summers v. Colette, 2019 Cal. App. LEXIS 347.  In reaching this conclusion, the Court noted that Section 800 includes the phrase "instituted or maintained" while Sections 5233 and 5142 do not.  The Court further noted that eschewing a continuous directorship requirement was consistent with the purposes of the statutes because a former director continues to be in the best position to bring breaches of trust to a court's attention.  In addition, the risk of harassment  is not high because potential plaintiffs under the statute are "few in number".  

The Court of Appeal's opinion concludes that the erstwhile director continued to have "standing" under Sections 5223, 5233 & 5142 after being removed from office.  The Court's reference to "standing".  The reference to "standing" should not be confused with federal constitutional standing.  Article III of the federal Constitution imposes a "case-or-controversy" limitation on federal court jurisdiction.  The California Constitution has no similar limitation.  

Advertisement
© 2010-2020 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 106
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Bishop works with privately held and publicly traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California.

While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of...

949-851-5428
Advertisement
Advertisement