December 14, 2018

December 14, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 13, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 12, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 11, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

A "Criminal Waste Of Space" Foments Concern About Possible Vestiarian Crisis

This month's issue of Orange County Lawyer includes another entertaining column by Court of Appeal Justice William D. Bedsworth.  He points out that Government Code Section 68110 requires every judge in open court during the presentation of causes before him or her "to wear a judicial robe, which the judge shall furnish at his or her own expense."  

Reading about California's judicial robe mandate could not help but remind me of the vestiarian crisis under Queen Elizabeth I.  The crisis arose when the Church of England sought to require the clergy to wear vestments.  The legal basis for the requirement was the Act of Uniformity (1 Eliz. 1 c 2)  that retained the "ornaments" of the church as in effect during the second year of the reign of King Edward VI.  The controversy erupted a few years later in 1566 when Archbishop of Canterbury Matthew Parker issued "advertisements" mandating strict conformity to the "ornaments" requirement of the Act, including the wearing of vestments (surplices).

The theological debate over the clerical vestment mandate centered on whether vestments were edifying or merely adiaphora.  The latter term refers to something that is permissible but not essential.  The word is derived from the Greek word ἀδιάφορα which translates as not different or indistinguishable. Dissenters argued that requiring observance of trivial requirements infringed on their consciences.  Eventually, some of these dissenters became known as "puritans".  It was English puritans who would eventually migrate to New England and become famous for establishing the first Thanksgiving.

© 2010-2018 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Paul Bishop is a partner in Allen Matkins' Corporate and Securities practice group, and works out of the Orange County office. He represents clients in a wide range of corporate transactions, including public and private securities offerings of debt and equity, mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests and tender offers, corporate governance matters and federal and state securities laws (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Act), investment adviser, financial services regulation, and California administrative law. He regularly advises clients...

949-851-5428