December 15, 2018

December 14, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 13, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

DOL Clarifies Rules for FMLA-Related Breaks

In an opinion letter issued on April 12, 2018, the U.S. Department of Labor concluded that 15-minute breaks throughout the day required by an employee’s serious health condition are not compensable—notwithstanding the general rule that breaks of 20 minutes or less are to be paid.  The agency explained the exception as follows:

[R]est breaks up to 20 minutes in length are generally compensable because the breaks predominantly benefit the employer.  Such breaks are “common in industry,” “promote the efficiency of the employee,” and “are customarily paid for as working time.”  29 C.F.R. § 785.18.  The specific FMLA-protected breaks described in [the opinion] letter, however, differ significantly from ordinary rest breaks commonly provided to employees.  … [T]he 15-minute breaks at issue here “are required eight times per day and solely due to the needs of the employee’s serious health condition as required under the FMLA.” Because the FMLA-protected breaks described in your letter are given to accommodate the employee’s serious health condition, the breaks predominantly benefit the employee and are noncompensable.  … [T]he FMLA itself further confirms that employees are not entitled to compensation for the FMLA-protected breaks described in [the] letter.  Indeed, the FMLA expressly provides that FMLA-protected leave may be unpaid.

The DOL noted, however, that employees who take FMLA-protected breaks must receive as many compensable rest breaks as their otherwise similarly-situated coworkers receive.

© 2018 Proskauer Rose LLP.


About this Author

Allan Bloom, Trial Lawyer, Proskaeuer

Allan Bloom is a nationally recognized trial lawyer and advisor who represents management in a broad range of employment and labor law matters. As a litigator, Allan has successfully defended a number of the world’s leading companies against claims for unpaid wages, employment discrimination, breach of contract and wrongful discharge, both at the trial and appellate court levels as well as in arbitration. He has secured complete defense verdicts for clients in front of juries, as well as injunctions to protect clients’ confidential information and assets.