March 31, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 90

Advertisement
Advertisement

March 31, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 30, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 29, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 28, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

EPA Releases Proposed Rule Designating Certain PFAS as CERCLA Hazardous Substances

Today the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a pre-publication version of its long-awaited proposal to designate perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), including their salts and structural isomers, as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).  For the first time, EPA proposes to designate hazardous substances directly under CERCLA Section 102(a).  If finalized as proposed, this action would mean that the federal CERCLA liability and cost recovery scheme will apply to PFOA and PFOS.  In addition, any person in charge of a facility or vessel must report a release of 1 pound or more of PFOA or PFOS within a 24-hour period that does not fall within an exemption, such as federally permitted releases.

After considering the proposed rule for eight months, the Office of Management and Budget determined earlier in August that it should be designated as an “economically significant rule,” meaning it is expected to result in costs of $100 million or more annually.  The “economically significant” designation means that EPA must issue a regulatory impact analysis for the rule.

Because no substance has been designated in this manner before, EPA’s proposed rule includes the criteria it used to determine whether a listing was appropriate under Section 102(a).  These criteria could be applied to any future designation under Section 102(a), so potential stakeholders should not ignore the broad implications of the proposed rule because it relates to PFOA and PFOS.  The rule is expected to be published in the Federal Register in the next few days, triggering a 60-day comment period.

The pre-publication version of the rule is available here.

© 2023 Beveridge & Diamond PC National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 238
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Nessa Coppinger Environmental Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Washington, DC
Principal

Nessa focuses her practice on complex environmental litigation, including multi-district litigation and multi-party product liability.

Clients rely on Nessa to help them solve their most complicated, expensive, and intractable problems. She has led significant trial court and appellate matters, including federal appeals, to a successful conclusion. She has experience with a range of high-stakes litigation, including mass environmental claims, coordinated litigation with federal government entities, class action, and single-party litigation. Nessa also counsels on and litigates...

202-789-6053
Jeanine L.G. Grachuk Environmental Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Boston, MA
Principal

Jeanine is a top-rated Massachusetts environmental lawyer with extensive experience in air, water, and waste issues arising within a variety of industrial sectors.

Solving puzzles is what Jeanine enjoys most about environmental law. She likes taking a complicated set of facts hidden in environmental reports and unpacking the information until the key legal issues are revealed.

When providing advice to clients, Jeanine listens for what they need—whether it’s a quick and actionable answer, a trusted counselor, or a gut check—in addition to their legal questions. She also...

617-419-2323