July 4, 2022

Volume XII, Number 185

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Exclusive Concurrent Jurisdiction Applies to Overlapping PAGA Actions

In a recent decision, the California Court of Appeal held that the doctrine of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction applies to a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) representative action in Shaw v. The Superior Court of Contra Costa County. The decision is good news for employers facing overlapping PAGA complaints.

Underlying Facts

On July 21, 2022, Plaintiff Shaw provided notice to the Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) under PAGA of alleged violations of the Labor Code against Beverages & More!, Inc (BevMo). Plaintiff alleged Labor Code violations based premised on a specific policy.  Over one year prior, however, Plaintiff Paez filed a PAGA action against BevMo regarding the same policy.

BevMo sought to stay the Shaw case under the doctrine of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction. Under the doctrine of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction, when two or more courts have subject matter jurisdiction of a dispute, the court that first asserted jurisdiction assumes it to the exclusion of other courts.

Shaw filed a petition to coordinate her action with the Paez action and asked for the appointment of her counsel as “liaison counsel” for the aggrieved employees. Shaw and BevMo agreed that the PAGA claims in Shaw’s case and the Paez case overlapped completely.

The trial court in Shaw stayed the action until either the Paez action was resolved, or the coordination motion was granted. The coordination motion was denied, as was Shaw’s motion to intervene in the Paez case.

Court of Appeal Ruling

The California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District held that the trial court did not err in applying exclusive concurrent jurisdiction to the overlapping PAGA claim. The opinion held that there was no evidence of legislative intent to alter the common law.

Impact for Employers

While employers previously sought to abate or stay overlapping PAGA actions prior to Shaw, there had not been definitive authority that the doctrine of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction applied. This decision should help employers better manage overlapping PAGA matters by ensuring that the initial case can proceed before the latter filed overlapping actions.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2022National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 130
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Cary G Palmer, Attorney, Jackson Lewis Law Firm
Office Managing Principal

Cary G. Palmer is Office Managing Principal of the Sacramento, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He represents management in employment, labor and benefits law and related litigation.

Mr. Palmer practices before the state and federal courts in California, the United States Department of Labor, the United States Equal Opportunity Commission, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, and the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. Mr. Palmer also defends management in statewide...

916-341-0404
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement