July 17, 2019

July 16, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 15, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

FDA 2018 Year in Review: Clinical Investigations

Developments in 2018

On October 12, FDA published guidance offering interim direction for researchers, sponsors and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) engaging in both FDA-regulated clinical trials and federally sponsored human subjects research regulated by the overarching rule known as the Common Rule. The Cures Act directed the Secretary of HHS to work to harmonize FDA’s clinical research regulations with the Common Rule . This effort is of increased importance as the numerous federal agencies and departments that have adopted the Common Rule adopted sweeping revisions to the law, which are fully effective on January 21, 2019.

While the guidance document, Impact of Certain Provisions of the Revised Common Rule on FDA-Regulated Clinical Investigations, only provides limited guidance while more extensive FDA rulemaking is forthcoming, it provides FDA’s current position and thinking on two important topics:

  • Informed Consent. The updated Common Rule includes several new requirements for informed consent, including changes to the content, organization and presentation of information to human subjects. FDA clarified that such additional elements could be built into the consent process for FDA-regulated clinical trials and that two consent forms would not be required, as the two rules are not inconsistent.

  • IRB Review. The updated Common Rule presumes that studies that meet a list of eligible categories will not involve more than minimal risk, permitting them to qualify for expedited review by an IRB, while FDA’s rules require an IRB to affirmatively make a risk determination. Similarly, the updated Common Rule eliminated the requirement for continuing IRB review for certain studies, whereas FDA’s rules require continuing review. FDA acknowledged these changes but confirmed that FDA-regulated clinical trials must still follow the FDA’s rules, which would not permit studies subject to both laws to benefit from the new pathways for decreased IRB oversight built into the new Common Rule.

At a high level, FDA also confirmed that in the event of a conflict between its regulations and the Common Rule, researchers are to follow the regulations that offer the greatest protection to human subjects. Given FDA’s signal that the agency is “actively working” to harmonize its regulations with the Common Rule, additional formal rulemaking could be on the horizon in 2019, particularly on the topics addressed in the guidance.

Read more on FDA 2018 Year in Review.

© 2019 McDermott Will & Emery


About this Author

Vernessa Pollard Pharmaceutical Attorney McDermott

    Vernessa T. Pollard is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Washington, D.C., office. Vernessa serves as co-head of the Firm’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) practice.

    Vernessa advises companies on regulatory, compliance, enforcement and legislative matters involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, digital and mobile health, health IT solutions and services, and emerging technologies and software. She also advises national and international food and cosmetic producers and retailers on...

    Veleka Peeples-Dyer, McDermott Will Emery, life sciences industry, FDA attorney, drug safety lawyer, health care fraud counsel,

    Veleka Peeples-Dyer is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm's Washington, D.C., office. She is an experienced attorney with an extensive background in the Life Sciences Industry, including Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation, clinical trials, manufacturing and supply, drug safety, licensing, product acquisition due diligence, health care fraud and abuse and compliance matters. Additionally, Veleka’s experience includes conducting internal investigations, developing and implementing legal and compliance training programs and advising on federal and state transparency, lobbyist and disclosure issues, including the Federal Physician Payments (Sunshine) Act.

    Veleka previously worked as in-house counsel to publicly-traded biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. She served as a strategic business and legal advisor, counseling on the full range of research, development, regulatory, compliance and commercialization issues that biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies face. Veleka’s earlier corporate counsel experience includes working in the government contracts and utilities industries. Veleka understands the challenges clients face in this industry by providing strategic and practical counsel on the challenges and business complexities that life sciences companies face.

    T Reed Stephens Attorney McDermott Will

    T. Reed Stephens is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm's Washington, D.C., office.  Reed represents clients involved in the Life Sciences industry, including pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturers, wholesalers, and individuals, as well as health care systems and non-health care related companies in the financial services industry.  In addition to representing clients in matters involving state and federal government law enforcement, voluntary disclosures, and congressional investigations Reed advises clients on mergers...

    202 756 8129
    Michael Ryan Attorney specializing in Pharma law McDermott Law Firm

    Michael W. Ryan is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

    Michael focuses his practice on the legal, regulatory and reimbursement issues that manufacturers and investors encounter in the development and commercialization of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, biotechnology products and laboratory services.  Michael counsels entities as they seek to obtain authorization to market their products from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, maintain compliance with applicable laws and regulations (including the...

    +1 202 756 8088
    Anisa Mohanty, McDermott Law Firm, Health Care Attorney

    Anisa Mohanty advises life sciences companies on regulatory, compliance, enforcement, policy, and legislative matters arising under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). She counsels pharmaceutical, medical device, and consumer product companies on premarket pathways, advertising and promotion, and current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) and Quality System requirements. Anisa also assists clients with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) engagement strategies and responding to FDA administrative and enforcement actions.