April 15, 2021

Volume XI, Number 105


April 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 13, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 12, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

FERC Policy Proposal May Advance State Efforts to Price Carbon Emissions

On October 15, 2020, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a proposed policy statement clarifying that it has jurisdiction over rules incorporating state-determined carbon pricing in wholesale electric markets, while also encouraging regional electric market operators to consider establishing carbon pricing rules. Comments on the proposed policy statement are due on or before November 16, 2020.

FERC issued the proposed policy statement after hosting a technical conference in September 2020 where attendees discussed state-determined carbon pricing and the potential benefits of incorporating state-determined carbon pricing into regional electricity markets. The proposed policy statement addresses a topic of ongoing controversy – how to reconcile FERC’s authority to regulate wholesale power market prices with the states’ authority to promote renewable energy generation. This controversy has, to date, resulted in one Supreme Court decision, at least two decisions from the U.S. Courts of Appeal, and threats from at least five states to withdraw from the PJM organized wholesale market because they view FERC’s actions, particularly on the Minimum Offer Price Rule, as creating artificial barriers to state goals for greatly expanding renewable energy.

Proposed Policy

The proposed policy statement recognizes that many states have adopted regulations that require decarbonization of the electricity sector to varying degrees. Many states use carbon pricing mechanisms to achieve these policy goals. However, efforts to reduce emissions by implementing a carbon-pricing mechanism could overlap with FERC’s jurisdiction over wholesale electricity rates. In FERC’s view, both state programs directly placing a price on carbon, including the “social cost of carbon” constructs that are gaining traction in a number of states, as well as costs associated with cap-and-trade programs, such as those arising under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in the northeast and mid-Atlantic states, could potentially implicate FERC’s wholesale rate jurisdiction. Given the increase in states looking to place a price on carbon, FERC observed that under section 205 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), it “may be called upon to review future proposals that incorporate a state-determined state carbon price” into regional organized markets such as PJM, Midwest Independent System Operator (ISO), and the California ISO. FERC concluded that, at least in some circumstances, it would permit state-mandated carbon pricing to be incorporated into FERC-regulated wholesale prices. While the proposed policy statement attempts to set forth some general standards for how FERC would review such state policies, final determinations would be made on a case-by-case basis.

Comments on Proposed Policy

FERC is seeking comment on the appropriate information to consider when it reviews a filing under section 205 of the FPA. Specifically, FERC seeks comments that address a number of questions, such as “how, if at all, do the relevant market design considerations change depending on the manner in which the state or states determine the carbon price (e.g., price-based or quantity-based methods)? How will that price be updated?” Comments are due on the proposed policy statement by November 16, 2020, and reply comments are due by December 1, 2020.

Broader Impact of Proposed Policy

Importantly, FERC notes that it is “proposing to issue a policy statement to encourage efforts to incorporate a state-determined carbon price in organized wholesale electricity markets.” FERC’s proposed policy statement provides an opening for states that want to introduce a carbon pricing proposal with less concern that such a plan would meet opposition from FERC. To some, the proposal may be viewed as an olive branch extended by FERC to the states that have called into question many of its recent initiatives because they are viewed as interfering with state climate goals. This proposed policy could spur additional states to consider incorporate a carbon price into their regional markets.

© 2021 Beveridge & Diamond PC National Law Review, Volume X, Number 297



About this Author

Eric Christensen Energy & Natural Resources Attorney
Of Counsel

Eric is a leading energy and natural resources attorney in the Pacific Northwest.

He assists renewable and traditional energy companies, as well as major energy consumers, to navigate the complex legal and regulatory systems governing the nation’s energy industry. With more than 30 years of experience, Eric has successfully represented clients in litigation and regulatory matters, ranging from the U.S. Supreme Court to proceedings before federal and state agencies. Before entering private practice, Eric served as Assistant General Counsel at Snohomish County (WA)...

Brook Detterman Environmental Litigation Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Boston, MA

Brook's practice focuses on climate change, renewable energy, and environmental litigation.

Brook helps his clients to navigate domestic and international climate change programs, develop renewable energy projects, and generate carbon offsets.  He helps his clients to negotiate, structure, and implement transactions related to carbon offsets and renewable energy, and works with clients during all phases of renewable energy and carbon offset project development.  Brook also represents clients during complex environmental litigation, having served as litigation and appellate counsel...

Kirstin K. Gruver Environmental Litigation Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Seattle, WA

Kirstin Gruver is efficient and responsive to clients' needs.

She maintains a diverse environmental litigation and regulatory practice, working with clients nationwide across industrial sectors with a focus on wetlands and water issues. She also has experience in product stewardship and sustainability matters.

Prior to joining Beveridge & Diamond, Kirstin worked as a deputy prosecuting attorney at the Clark County Prosecutor's office. She also worked as a legal intern with the Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, and as a summer clerk at Earthjustice....