Fiduciary Regulation And The Exemptions: Interesting Angles on the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule #6
This is the sixth article about interesting observations “hidden” in the preambles to the fiduciary regulation and the exemptions.
In some cases, the concerns about the scope of the fiduciary rule are overblown. For example, there have been some statements that advice about minimum required distributions for IRAs would be fiduciary advice. That is not the case.
In the preamble to the fiduciary regulation, the DOL explained:
“With respect to the tax code provisions regarding required minimum distributions, the Department agrees with commenters that merely advising a participant or IRA owner that certain distributions are required by tax law would not constitute investment advice. Whether such “tax” advice is accompanied by a recommendation that constitutes “investment advice” would depend on the particular facts and circumstances involved.”
So, basic advice about tax requirements and consequences is not fiduciary advice. However, if the adviser recommends which investments the IRA owner should sell to fund the distribution, that is fiduciary investment advice which must be:
prudent and in the best interest of the IRA owner, and
free from financial conflicts of interest (or in compliance with a prohibited transaction exemption).
The views expressed in this article are the views of Fred Reish, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Drinker Biddle & Reath.