October 1, 2020

Volume X, Number 275

September 30, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Fourth Circuit Affirms Conviction in Virginia Bank Fraud Case

The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently affirmed convictions for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and other related charges against three former executives of the Bank of the Commonwealth.

In 2008, the Bank of the Commonwealth, a community bank in southeastern Virginia, failed and ultimately caused the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to sustain approximately $333 million in losses as the bank’s receiver. In December 2012, the bank’s former executives were charged with a conspiracy to hide the bank’s deteriorating financial condition. Following a 10-week trial involving more than 80 witnesses and 1,000 exhibits, the executives were convicted on multiple charges. Three executives appealed their convictions on various substantive and procedural grounds. Most prominently addressed was one appellant’s claim that the District Court improperly limited his time on direct testimony.

The Fourth Circuit held that, although the District Court did eventually restrict the defendant’s time on direct examination, the District Court granted multiple extensions after warning defense counsel about straying into irrelevant topics. The Fourth Circuit also emphasized that the appellant testified on direct examination for more than seven hours, which was the longest witness examination of the trial. Similarly, the court noted that the appellant was charged with fewer counts yet testified longer than each of his co-defendants. In light of the extensions, warnings, and greater amount of time available to present his case, the Fourth Circuit found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the duration of the appellant’s direct testimony.

United States v. Fields, Nos. 13-4711, 13-4818, 13-4863 (4th Cir. June 5, 2015).

©2020 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPNational Law Review, Volume V, Number 163

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Zachary D Denver, Litigation Attorney, Katten Muchin Rosenman
Associate

Zachary Denver concentrates his practice in litigation and dispute resolution matters.

While attending law school, Zachary was an editor of the NYU Journal of Law and Liberty, and was a board member for the Suspension Representation Project.

212-940-6498