October 22, 2020

Volume X, Number 296


October 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 20, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Full Steam Ahead: EPA Moves Forward with Key Initiative to Reduce Emissions at U.S. Ports

EPA’s Office of Transportation Air Quality recently issued a report titled “EPA and Port Everglades Partnership: Emission Inventories and Reduction Strategies” (“the Port Everglades Report”).[1] The Port Everglades Report comes in the wake of EPA’s 2016 “National Port Strategy Assessment: Reducing Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases at U.S. Ports.”[2] Both the Port Everglades Report and the National Port Strategy Assessment are part of EPA’s “Ports Initiative,”[3] which seeks to establish a framework for stakeholders to evaluate and implement air pollution emission-reduction initiatives at ports.

Although EPA acknowledges the Port Everglades Report is not a “policy document and does not include policy recommendations,” the agency makes clear that the report will inform EPA’s update to its Port Emissions Inventory Guidance. The report also provides options to inform voluntary emission reduction actions.

Industry stakeholders should closely monitor EPA’s Ports Initiative, as well as developments at the state and local level, that are intended to reduce port-related emissions (such as proposed regulations, voluntary measures, and/or other updates to guidance documents).


The Port Everglades Report acknowledges ports are critical to the U.S. economy and essential for transporting cargo, fuel and passengers. The report also recognizes that, as part of its broader Ports Initiative, EPA must (1) have an “on-the-ground” understanding of how ports operate on a “day-to-day basis” and (2) examine available methods to estimate port-related air emissions. To this end, EPA and Port Everglades – one of the nations’ leading container ports, south Florida’s main port for receiving petroleum products, and one of the world’s busiest cruise ports –participated in a first-of-its-kind collaboration to study mobile source emissions.

Port Everglades developed a 2015 baseline air emissions inventory from which to measure the impact of future port changes. EPA also used this baseline inventory to develop future hypothetical emission inventories and scenarios to evaluate potential new diesel-emission reduction strategies at Port Everglades. The study considered a variety of emission sources, including ocean-going vessels, harbor craft, cargo-handling equipment, trucks, and locomotives. EPA evaluated both current and future emissions, as well as potential strategies for three “off-port” transportation corridors – a marine corridor, a truck corridor, and a rail corridor. According to the report, the “partnership will provide future measures, lessons learned, and practical examples that can be shared with other ports, related agencies, and industry stakeholders.”

Key Takeaways

  • EPA will apply the lessons learned from the Port Everglades collaboration to develop emission reduction strategies and methods that can be applied at other ports.

    • The partnership served as a “technical training ground” for EPA and allowed EPA to better understand port operations.

    • The lessons learned as part of the Port Everglades collaboration “will inform future EPA guidance” and “can be applied to other interested ports.”

  • Obtaining accurate and comprehensive emissions inventory information is the foundation of a successful emission-reduction strategy.

    • Inventories allow ports to “examine emission trends by source, identify potential opportunities for emission reductions, and prioritize future investment or operational changes to reduce emissions.” For example, ocean going vessels are the largest current source of emissions. Despite the implementation of increasingly stringent emission control requirements, emissions from vessels are expected to remain the largest source of port-related emissions for the foreseeable future. However, reduced hotelling time, among other things, is likely to reduce emissions.

    • By obtaining comprehensive inventories, Port Everglades can now examine emission trends by source, identify potential opportunities for emission reductions, and prioritize future investment or operational changes to reduce emissions. For example, an analysis of the equipment inventory at the port showed that harbor craft (which produce considerably less emissions than OGVs but still account for the third-most on-port NOx and PM emissions) constituted a large proportion of older equipment, meaning that emission reductions could likely be achieved by offering incentives for vessel or engine replacement.

  • On balance, port-related emissions have declined, but there are opportunities for achieving additional emission reductions through voluntary measures.

    • The “Business-as-Usual” inventories indicate EPA’s engine and fuel regulations, along with the emergence of new commercially available technologies, will lead to port-related emissions reductions. However, the Port Everglades Report lists other voluntary strategies – such as accelerating equipment replacement rates – that could reduce emissions even further and/or sooner. These voluntary strategies include those in the table below.

    • According to the report, “ports can assess which [strategies] make the most sense for their specific conditions.” 

Table 1-1. On-Port Strategies Considered at Port Everglades 


Strategy Description

Ocean Going Vessels

Reduce hotelling time by 5% or 10%

Alternative control technology at berths (e.g., capture and treat)

Use of lower-sulfur and alternative (e.g., LNG) fuels

Application of shore power to reduce engine operations while dockside

Harbor Craft

Engine and vessel replacement

Cargo Handling Equipment

Engine and equipment electrification

Diesel particulate filters and oxidation catalysts

On-road Vehicles

Truck replacement to Model Year 2010+

Battery electric vehicles (BEVs)

Reduction of truck idling times


Increase modal shift of cargo from truck to rail

After the Port Everglades Report: What’s Next?

EPA will use the methods and inventories generated by the Port Everglades Report to inform the update to EPA’s Port Emissions Inventory guidance and “future inventory development and strategy analyses across the [United States].” It remains to be seen, however, what other action the report will lead to at the federal level and in what ways local, regional, and/or state regulators will utilize this information.

The authors graciously acknowledge the assistance of Leigh S. Barton, a summer associate with the firm, in the preparation of this Alert.

[1] Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-06/documents/420s18002.pdf.

[2] See Beveridge & Diamond P.C., “EPA Issues “National Port Strategy Assessment: Reducing Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases at U.S. Ports.”

[3] Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ports-initiative.

© 2020 Beveridge & Diamond PC National Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 167



About this Author

David C. Weber Air & Climate Change Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Seattle, WA
Office Managing Principal

David C. Weber is the Managing Principal and co-founder of Beveridge & Diamond’s Seattle office. 

He also serves as the co-chair of the firm’s Air and Climate Change group. Dave focuses his practice on environmental litigation and compliance counseling, including air and water quality regulation, hazardous waste handling and remediation, and contaminated site cleanups under federal and state laws.

A cornerstone of Dave's practice is advising clients on national air quality and climate change issues. He represents businesses in connection with enforcement proceedings,...

Daniel B. Schulson Environmental & Administrative Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Washington, DC

Daniel Schulson applies the insight and experience he gained from working in the Office of General Counsel at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to clients’ challenges on a broad array of issues.

He assists clients with many aspects of environmental and administrative law, including compliance counseling, permitting, due diligence, audits, commenting on agency rulemakings, administrative enforcement defense, and litigation.

Examples of Dan’s experience include:

  • Providing counsel to the U.S. government-appointed Independent Compliance Monitor and Auditor in conjunction with the Volkswagen “Dieselgate” plea agreement and consent decree.
  • Resolving issues for automotive manufacturers including those involving vehicle and engine certification, and compliance with EPA and California Air Resources Board requirements for obtaining Certificates of Conformity and Executive Orders.
  • Advising original equipment manufacturers on vehicle import regulations as well as National Highway Traffic Safety Administration motor vehicle safety standards, emissions, and fuel economy requirements.
  • Advising clients on mobile source compliance, including both on-road and non-road requirements.
  • Counseling companies on a wide range of stationary source permitting and compliance issues under the Clean Air Act and comparable state laws.
  • Preparing comments for companies and trade associations on both federal and state proposed air regulations.
  • Counseling clients on “voluntary disclosures” under EPA’s self-disclosure policy and similar state-based policies.
  • Negotiating favorable administrative settlements with EPA and state regulators for alleged violations of environmental statutes, including the Clean Air Act, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act.
  • Defending a leading crop-protection company in a multi-million dollar EPA administrative enforcement action.
  • Representing leading crop-protection companies in Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and Endangered Species Act federal litigation challenging product registrations.
  • Advising companies including a global pharmaceutical company and a major oil and gas company on the environmental aspects of corporate transactions and conducting related due diligence.
  • Drafting a successful petition for review and subsequent state supreme court briefs in defense of a solid waste recycling company facing toxic tort claims brought by individuals alleging agricultural operations constituted a nuisance.

While at EPA, Dan formulated effective litigation strategies to defend agency actions and advised senior EPA officials on matters arising under a variety of statutes including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and the Resource Conservation Recovery Act. Dan was awarded an EPA commendation for outstanding counseling on administrative and regulatory law issues, and a Department of Justice commendation for assisting in the successful defense of EPA’s suite of greenhouse gas regulations.

David M. Friedland Air Pollution Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Washington, DC

David’s practice touches every aspect of the regulation of air pollution under the Clean Air Act and state and local air pollution statutes and regulations.

On the regulatory side, he has helped companies and trade associations prepare comments on scores of proposed rules including revisions to the ozone and particulate matter NAAQS, several rounds of PSD/NSR regulations (e.g., the WEPCO rule in 1992, the NSR Reform rule in 2002, the equipment replacement rule in 2003, and the Duke hourly rate rule in 2006), numerous MACT standards (e.g., the boiler, commercial and industrial solid...