May 26, 2022

Volume XII, Number 146

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 25, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Governments are Pulling Back the Crypto-Currency Curtain

Coinbase Inc., a virtual currency exchange platform, was recently ordered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to provide the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with 2013-2015 transaction data for thousands of Coinbase accounts. See United States v. Coinbase Inc., et al., No. 17-CV-01431-JSC, 2017 WL 5890052, (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2017). The IRS, citing references to 5.9 million customers and more than $6 billion of bitcoin transactions on Coinbase’s website, identified a potential reporting gap, since only 800-900 taxpayers have identified bitcoin transactions on their tax returns in the past few years. (Coinbase’s website currently references 10 million customers and $50 billion in transactions.) Although the IRS narrowed the scope of the third-party record keeper summons it had originally issued to Coinbase under Code Sections 7602, 7603 and 7609 (aka, a “John Doe Summons”), the parties could not reach agreement on what was to be produced, and the government initiated enforcement proceedings earlier this year.

For each account with at least the equivalent of $20,000 in any one transaction type (buy, sell, send or receive), the court ordered Coinbase to provide the IRS with: (1) the name, taxpayer ID number and birth date of the account holder; (2) account records (including transaction activity, account balances and counterparty identity); and (3) account statements or invoices. Coinbase has not publicly indicated whether it will appeal the court’s order. Nonetheless, it is highly likely the IRS will continue to seek this information as it develops a data set on bitcoin transactions. For example, since Coinbase represented that most of the accounts had not executed a single transaction that met the value threshold identified in the summons, expect the IRS to lower that figure or replace it with an account balance metric.

The IRS is not the only government agency considering responses to the crypto-currency phenomenon. European leaders are moving towards adding virtual currency exchange platforms and virtual currency “wallet” providers to the anti-money-laundering know-your-customer regulations for financial institutions and non-bank institutions. The recent boom in bitcoin valuation and activity is motivating authorities to move quickly to ensure the fledgling markets are not becoming vehicles for tax evasion, money laundering and other nefarious activities—a significant concern for all public and private stakeholders.

Practice Point: As the Coinbase case demonstrates, taxing authorities around the world are gaining interest and expertise in virtual currency transactions, and as in any fledgling industry, tax compliance may be an area of dispute. For those participating in virtual currency transactions of any kind (i.e., purchasing, selling, receiving, sending), it is important to inform tax return preparers and other tax advisors so that these transactions can be properly accounted. 

© 2022 McDermott Will & EmeryNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 347
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Partner

Roger J. Jones is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office. Roger specializes in tax controversy and litigation matters representing taxpayers, including numerous Fortune 500 companies, in over 75 matters at all levels of the Federal court system, including the United States Tax Court, Federal District Court, the Court of Federal Claims, the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court, as well as before various State courts.

312-984-2731
Louis, MWE, portrait
Associate

Michael R. Louis focuses practice on representing individuals and entities in US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examinations, administrative appeals, civil tax controversies and criminal tax proceedings. Michael also has advised clients on the US federal tax consequences of corporate reorganizations and capital restructurings.

Michael studied at St. Francis College, Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, and New York University School of Law.

214-295-8087
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement