May 26, 2020

Hydro Newsletter - Volume 7, Issue 1

Supreme Court Denies Petition for Certiorari in Hoopa Valley Tribe

On December 9, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by California Trout and Trout Unlimited of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s (D.C. Circuit) January 25, 2019 decision in Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC.  In that case, the D.C. Circuit held that the withdrawal and resubmission of a water quality certification request under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) does not trigger a new statutory period of review.  With the denial of certiorari, the D.C. Circuit case is now final.

FERC Refuses to Require Removal of Pre-Existing Dam as Condition of License Termination

On December 19, 2019, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) denied a request for rehearing and stay of its August 2019 order terminating the original license for the Enloe Project for failure to timely commence construction.  The Enloe Project was to be located at an existing non-powered dam in Washington State.  After the licensee failed to commence construction of the project by the statutory deadline, FERC staff issued an order terminating the license for failure to commence construction (Termination Order).  Several conservation groups filed motions to intervene and joint requests for rehearing and stay of the Termination Order, arguing that FERC staff failed to properly notice the proposed termination of the license, and that FERC staff should have required the licensee to develop a plan for disposition of the dam and other facilities that existed at the project site prior to licensing.  The groups argued that terminating the license without decommissioning the preexisting facilities would harm the public interest because it was unclear what agency would have jurisdiction over the dam and other facilities or how dam safety would be monitored after FERC’s jurisdiction is terminated.

FERC denied the motions to intervene, rejected the request for rehearing, and dismissed the request for stay of the Termination Order.  FERC found that in the case of license termination for failure to commence construction, the licensee is not required to propose a decommissioning plan with steps to remedy impacts of the project on the environment.  FERC found that “the suggestion that a licensee that has failed to timely commence construction should be required to remove or modify structures that it did not build pursuant to its license is inappropriate and would, even assuming we had the authority to impose such measures, represent bad policy.”  FERC also upheld its longstanding policy limiting the right to intervention in post-license proceedings, and found that termination of a license for failure to commence construction is a ministerial act between FERC and the licensee.  It also found that FERC staff gave adequate notice of the probable termination of the license to interested stakeholders by publishing notice in the project docket, and staff was not required to publish notice of the termination in the Federal Register

President Trump Signs Spending Bill with Extension of PTC and ITC for Qualifying Hydro and Marine Energy Facilities

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed a spending bill, H.R. 1865, that extends government funding, avoids another shutdown, and includes several tax extender provisions for renewable resources.  The bill retroactively extends the production tax credit (PTC) and investment tax credit (ITC) for qualifying hydro and marine energy facilities for 2018 and 2019 and prospectively through 2020 at existing levels.  The PTC and ITC for hydropower were originally included in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) (effective beginning in 2006). Marine and hydrokinetic projects became eligible for the programs in 2008. Before the PTC expired in 2017, wind and geothermal facilities received a PTC of 1.5 cents per kilowatt hour indexed for inflation, and open and closed loop biomass, municipal solid waste, hydropower, and marine and hydrokinetic facilities received 50% of that amount. As an alternative to the PTC, a hydropower project could elect to receive an ITC equal to 30% of the qualified investment in the project.  The hydropower PTC and ITC expired at the end of 2017, so only projects that began construction before the end of 2017 could qualify.  The spending bill extends the PTC and ITC (in lieu of PTC) to projects that commence construction by the end of 2020.  The spending bill did not include tax credits for energy storage facilities.

The spending bill also provides record funding for the Department of Energy’s Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO).  The bill allocates $148 million for the WPTO in Fiscal Year 2020, with $109 million directed to the marine energy program and $39 million to the hydropower/pumped storage program.  The bill directs the WPTO to apply $7 million of the hydropower program’s funding to the EPAct Section 242 hydropower production incentive.

Ninth Circuit Directs EPA to Approve TMDLs for Columbia and Snake Rivers

On December 20, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit), in Columbia Riverkeeper v. Wheelerheld that because Washington and Oregon have conclusively refused to develop and issue temperature total maximum daily loads (TMDL) for the Columbia and Snake Rivers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is obligated to act under the CWA.  The Ninth Circuit concluded that Washington and Oregon’s failure to act constitutes constructive submission of no temperature TMDL and triggered the EPA’s nondiscretionary duty to approve or disapprove the TMDL.  As EPA has so far failed to do so, the Court stated “the EPA must do so now.” 

This Ninth Circuit opinion has the potential to affect the hydro industry.  Although hydroelectric projects are not typically subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits, the TMDL for temperature in the Columbia and Snake Rivers could come into play in the CWA Section 401 certification process. 

Craddock Named ASCE OPAL Awards Winner

Ted Craddock has been named by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) as one of five 2020 winners of its prestigious Outstanding Projects And Leaders (OPAL) awards. Craddock is California Department of Water Resources’ acting Deputy Director for the State Water Project, and was Project Manager for the Oroville Emergency Recovery project, a $1.1 billion emergency repair of the spillway complex for the Oroville Facilities, the tallest dam in the United States. The emergency repair included, as just one component, the innovative use of 350,000 cubic-yards of roller-compacted concrete to serve as the foundation for reconstructing the lower portion of the main spillway. The emergency repair, which was completed between 2017 and 2018 by a team of over 1,000 people working virtually around the clock, also has been named by ASCE as one of 10 outstanding civil engineering projects around the world. The OPAL award for innovation in construction projects and programs is a lifetime achievement award reflecting Craddock’s leadership on complex projects throughout California. Craddock will be honored at ASCE’s 2020 OPAL Gala on March 13 in Washington, D.C.

© 2020 Van Ness Feldman LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Michael Swiger, Van Ness Feldman Law Firm, Washington DC, Energy Law Attorney
Partner

Mike Swiger represents a broad cross-section of entities with interests in energy and water development before federal agencies and the presidential administration, the U.S. Congress, and the federal courts. These include investor-owned utilities, state power authorities, municipal utilities, water agencies and irrigation districts, private developers, and others.

Mike has substantial experience on the full range of issues associated with major energy and water projects. He currently is involved in several major hydroelectric license proceedings...

202-298-1891
Sharon White, Van Ness Feldman Law Firm, Washington DC, Energy and Environmental Law Attorney
Of Counsel

Sharon represents a broad range of clients on issues relating to the regulation of hydroelectric projects before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, federal and state regulatory agencies, and the U.S. Courts of Appeal.  She has significant experience providing counsel on licensing and environmental matters under Part I of the Federal Power Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, and other statutes affecting energy development.  In addition, Sharon regularly represents clients’ interests in a range of hydroelectric regulatory proceedings, including licensing and relicensing, preliminary permits, license transfers and amendments, and compliance matters.  On behalf of the hydroelectric industry, Sharon has prepared amicus curiae briefs before several U.S. Courts of Appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court.  Sharon also represents a large group of hydroelectric licensees in challenges to federal agencies’ annual charges for costs incurred in administering Part I of the FPA. 

202.298.1871
Rachael L. Lipinski Associate Van Ness Feldman  natural resources, environmental, maritime law
Associate

Rachael practices in the areas of natural resources, environmental, and maritime law. She has experience providing counsel on complex regulatory, enforcement, and litigation matters under a range of environmental statutes, including the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Prior to joining the firm, Rachael was an Attorney Advisor for the U.S. Coast Guard’s Office of Maritime and International Law where she worked in the Environmental Law Division. She advised the Coast Guard...

206-802-3843