July 19, 2019

July 18, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 16, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

It’s That Time of Year: The BCFP’s Annual Adjustment to the Maximum Allowable Charge for Consumer Disclosures

Effective January 1, 2019, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection raised the maximum amount a Consumer Reporting Agency is allowed to charge a consumer for a copy of their consumer file disclosure under the FCRA to $12.50 a pop.  You can see the final rule from the BCFP here.  Of course, this increased cost per disclosure applies only to copies outside of the one free disclosure per year provided under § 1681j(a), or the other exceptions listed under §§ 1681j(b)-(d).

This is nothing new, really.  Prior to 2011, the FTC set the maximum allowable charge under § 1681j(f) of the FCRA.  Since 2011, the BCFP has published these FCRA annual adjustments as a notice.  The notable difference this year is that the BCFP is codifying its prior notices and is also adding a provision to Regulation V, which implements the FCRA, to track the FCRA’s provisions concerning the annual maximum allowable charge, including a list of historical maximum allowable charges.

Finally, for those of you FCRAland readers who are curious as to how this maximum allowable charge figure is obtained, rest assured that the process is not arbitrary!  The BCFP calculates the annual adjustment by finding the product of the $8 maximum listed in § 1681j(f)(1)(A)(i) and the percentage increase in the CPI-U (the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers) between September 1997 (the effective date of § 1681j(a)) and September 2018.  In that span of time, the CPI-U increased by 56.59%.

$8.00 x 56.59% = $4.53.

$8.00 + $4.53 = $12.53.

However, since the statute requires the resulting figure to be rounded to the nearest $0.50, the resulting amount is $12.50.  There you have it!

Copyright © 2019 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP All Rights Reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Shane Micheil, Womble Bond Dickinson Law Firm, Orange County, Finance and Communications Litigation Attorney
Associate

Shane focuses his practice on commercial and financial services litigation.  He is part of a nationally-recognized team with broad experience defending financial institutions in cases involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  He also has significant experience in Fair Credit Reporting Act cases. 

Shane’s experience includes serving as lead defense attorney for more than 20 single-plaintiff FCRA lawsuits in state and federal courts in multiple states. He also represented a major credit reporting agency in mediation of an FCRA case in the...

657-266-1053