March 18, 2018

March 16, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 15, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

ITC Denies Emergency Petitions on Relief from Exclusion Order

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) denied respondent’s emergency petitions to modify, suspend or rescind the ITC’s limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist order pending appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) inter partes review final written decisions, which found unpatentable the claims of two patents previously held to be in violation by respondent under § 337. In reCertain Network Devices, Inv. No. 337-TA-945 (ITC, June 20, 2017).

The ITC instituted its investigation of Arista Networks’ devices based on a complaint filed by Cisco Systems, which alleged § 337 violations by way of infringement of six Cisco patents. The ITC found a violation of § 337 as to certain claims of two Cisco patents, and as a result issued a limited exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order regarding Arista Networks’ infringing devices.

Parallel to the ITC proceedings, the same two patents that formed the basis of the ITC’s § 337 violation findings were subject to inter partes review at the PTAB. Ultimately, the PTAB issued final written decisions finding the claims of both patents unpatentable. In light of the PTAB’s decisions, Arista Networks filed emergency petitions seeking the suspension or rescission of the ITC’s remedial orders pending appeal of the PTAB decisions.

The ITC denied Arista Networks’ emergency petitions, however, finding that “the PTAB’s final written decisions do not constitute a changed circumstance such that the remedial orders should be rescinded.” Specifically, the ITC noted that the legal status of those claims at issue would not change unless and until the US Patent and Trademark Office issued a certificate canceling the claims following the exhaustion of all appeals.

© 2018 McDermott Will & Emery


About this Author

Michael Hemes, McDermott Law Firm, Patent Infringment Litigation Attorney

Michael Hemes focuses his practice on patent infringement litigation and inter partes review proceedings involving a broad range of technologies, including representing clients in disputes related to telecommunication technologies and computer application products. Michael’s practice also includes counseling clients on issues related to patentability, validity and infringement of patents.

With regard to transactional IP matters, Michael has experience in the transfer of university-based research to licensees for the development of new...