October 20, 2019

October 18, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

The Latest: New DOJ Antitrust Division Policy Makes Compliance Programs More Critical than Ever

What Happened:

  • Last week, the Antitrust Division reported that it has changed its Justice Manual to state that it will consider antitrust compliance at the charging stage in criminal antitrust investigations, instead of waiting for plea negotiation or the sentencing stage.

  • Previously, the Antitrust Division had granted leniency only to the first whistleblower to come completely clean. Under the Antitrust Division’s policy reversal, this is no longer the only way to gain credit with the Antitrust Division, and the Antitrust Division will now consider if the Company has “robust” compliance programs when determining whether to bring charges.

  • With the announcement this past Thursday, the Antitrust Division published a guidance document that focuses on evaluating compliance programs in criminal antitrust investigations. This is the first time the Antitrust Division has published guidance on evaluating compliance programs in the context of criminal antitrust violations, and companies can now use this document to determine whether their compliance programs are in line with the Antitrust Division’s standards.

  • The Antitrust Division lists certain factors that Antitrust Division prosecutors should consider when evaluating the effectiveness of an antitrust compliance program. These are:

    1. The design and comprehensiveness of the program

    2. The culture of compliance within the company

    3. Responsibility for, and resources dedicated to, antitrust compliance

    4. Antitrust risk assessment techniques

    5. Compliance training and communication to employees

    6. Monitoring and auditing techniques, including continued review, evaluation and revision of the antitrust compliance program

    7. Reporting mechanisms

    8. Compliance incentives and discipline

    9. Remediation methods

  • In general, when analyzing a program, the Antitrust Division will ask whether the compliance program is well designed, whether it is being applied earnestly and in good faith, and whether it works.

  • Finally, the Antitrust Division also revised sections of its Manual on the processes for recommending indictments, plea agreements and selecting compliance monitors.

What this Means:

  • To take advantage of this new guidance from the Antitrust Division, companies should evaluate their current antitrust compliance policies and, if necessary, bolster them to be able to take advantage of the Antitrust Division’s new leniency policy.

  • Companies seeking to implement best practices following this announcement should take the following steps:

    1. Have a clear written antitrust compliance policy that is available to all employees.

    2. Conduct regular antitrust compliance training and refresh trainings on a yearly basis. All new hires should also receive antitrust training.

    3. Have a system in place for employees to report any potentially anticompetitive behavior.

    4. Develop meaningful consequences for violations of the company’s compliance rules.

    5. Conduct periodic targeted email searches to determine if employees are in compliance with the company’s compliance policy.

    6. Emphasize the importance of compliance from senior management to the corporation’s culture and way of doing business.

© 2019 McDermott Will & Emery

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Nicole L. Castle, Antitrust Attorney, McDermott Will Law firm
Associate

Nicole L. Castle is an associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s New York office.  She focuses her practice on complex civil and criminal antitrust litigation.  She has extensive experience representing clients in class action antitrust litigations at the trial and appellate level and defending mergers and acquisitions before the U.S. antitrust agencies.  She has also counseled clients on strategies for addressing cartel prosecutions and defenses, from the inception of government investigations to the initiation of civil class action litigation...

212-547-5480
Stefen Meisner Attorney McDermott Will Emery
Partner

Stefan M. Meisner is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C., office.  Stefan is co-chair of the Firm’s Electronic Data Management, Privacy & Discovery group.

202 756 8344
Paul M. Thompson, McDermott Will Emery, White Collar Criminal Defense,
Partner

Paul M. Thompson is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and serves as the Partner-in-Charge of the Firm’s Washington, D.C., office.  Paul focuses his practice on white-collar criminal defense, congressional investigations and appellate matters.  Paul has been repeatedly recognized by the National Law Journal in its Appellate Hot List.  He was named as a “Star” in Benchmark Litigation 2015 for his work on white-collar matters and appeals. 

Paul is a former federal prosecutor.  He has represented clients...

1 202 756 8032