May 28, 2020

May 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Massachusetts Governor Baker Approves First Major Overhaul of Public Records Law

Massachusetts has its first significant update of its Public Records Law since the 1970s with promises of swifter responses and real consequences including attorney’s fees for failures to comply. 

In August 2015, we reported on a proposed bill from a joint House-Senate Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight targeted at revamping the Massachusetts Public Records Law, Chapter 66, Section 10. Less than a year later, a somewhat different bill, Bill. H.4333 (An Act to improve public records) was unanimously approved by the House and Senate and signed by Governor Charlie Baker in June.  The bill’s provisions become effective January 1, 2017.

Open records advocates have long bemoaned the lack of transparency, high fees, and untimeliness of Massachusetts agencies and municipalities.  In November 2015, the Center for Public Integrity again issued Massachusetts an “F” grade for public access to information and ranked it 40th in the nation.  But while open government advocates are applauding Bill H.4333 as a step forward in modernizing the state’s Public Records Law, critics remain concerned that the bill’s provisions are too strict and will be expensive and difficult to implement, particularly at the municipal level.  

The bill amends the existing Public Records Law requirements across several categories, including stricter response timeframes, limits on the assessment of fees, and measures for the award of legal fees.  Key provisions include:

  • A 10-day timeframe for responding to public records with documents, with certain limited provisions for requesting extensions.

  • No fees for the first four hours of time spent fulfilling a request.

  • Fees for black and white copies capped at 5 cents per page.  

  • Creation of educational materials, forms, guidelines, and other similar references to assist the public in making public records requests.

  • Designation of “records access officers” by state agencies and municipalities to coordinate and handle responses to public records requests.

  • Delivery of documents in electronic format, where available.

  • Posting of certain categories of public records on agency and municipal websites, including:

    • annual reports,

    • notices of hearings,

    • proposed regulations,

    • open meeting minutes, and

    • awards of government grants.

  • A rebuttable presumption in favor of awarding attorney’s fees and costs to requesters prevented from obtaining public records.  If attorney’s fees are not awarded, the court’s decision must explain why the award was denied.

  • Punitive damages of $1,000-$5,000 may be assessed against agencies and municipalities that unlawfully withhold requested records or fail to timely produce requested records in good faith.  Punitive damages are to be paid into a new Public Records Assistance Fund.

While the new amended law addresses some of the concerns of open records advocates as to timing, fees, judicial relief, and streamlining of procedures, Bill H.4333 stops short of removing the existing exemptions that limit the applicability of the Public Records Law to the judicial and legislative branches.  Instead, a special legislative commission would be organized to study the accessibility of information on the practices and procedures of the legislative process and the constitutionality and practicality of applying the Public Records Law to the legislature, Governor’s Office, and the judicial branch.  The special legislative commission is required to prepare a report by December 30, 2017 with recommendations on expanding and reforming the Public Records Law as it relates to the various branches of government. Thus, there may be continued efforts to expand and revamp open access to a broader swathe of government records.

© 2020 Beveridge & Diamond PC

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Marc J. Goldstein, Environmental Attorney, Beveridge Diamond law firm
Office Managing Principal

Marc helps clients resolve problems and disputes arising from environmental contamination and residential, commercial, and industrial project development.

Marc helps clients resolve problems and disputes arising from environmental contamination and residential, commercial, and industrial project development. Going beyond legal issues, Marc works closely with clients to address the business risks and solve the business problems that complex environmental and land use disputes pose. For example, Marc defends companies against government enforcement actions threatening...

617.419.2315
Brook J. Detterman, Beveridge Diamond, Climate Change Lawyer, Liabilities Law
Principal

Brook's practice focuses on climate change, renewable energy, and environmental litigation.

Brook helps his clients to navigate domestic and international climate change programs, develop renewable energy projects, and generate carbon offsets.  He helps his clients to negotiate, structure, and implement transactions related to carbon offsets and renewable energy, and works with clients during all phases of renewable energy and carbon offset project development.  Brook also represents clients during complex environmental litigation, having served as litigation and appellate counsel during dozens of proceedings in state and federal courts across the country. 

Prior to joining the firm, Brook was an associate in the environmental department of a large international law firm.

Brook served as a law clerk at the U.S. Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, where he worked on a range of legal issues arising under federal environmental law, including Clean Water Act (CWA) wetlands jurisdiction, liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) compliance, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements.

Brook also maintains an active pro bono practice, counseling individuals and non-profit entities on a range of legal matters in Massachusetts.

617.419.2345
Virginie K Roveillo Environmental Litigation Attorney Beveridge Diamond Law Firm
Associate

Virginie Roveillo divides her practice between environmental litigation and regulatory matters. Prior to joining Beveridge & Diamond, Virginie was a Graduate Fellow at the Conservation Law Center in Bloomington, Indiana.

781-416-5726