February 6, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 37

Error message

  • Warning: Undefined variable $settings in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).
Advertisement

February 03, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Finds Employer’s Ban on Unfair Criticism Unlawful

A hospital’s code of conduct forbidding comments that stray beyond “fair criticism” and behavior detrimental to “promoting teamwork” were unlawful, NLRB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Susan Flynn has ruled. William Beaumont Hospital, Case No. 07-CA-093885 (January 30, 2014).

The hospital’s code of conduct stated, in part:

Conduct on the part of a Beaumont employee or physician that is inappropriate or detrimental to patient care of [sic] Hospital operation or that impedes harmonious interactions and relationships will not be tolerated….Improper conduct or inappropriate behavior or defiance in the following example [sic], which includes but is not limited [sic] to the following:

[4] Verbal comments or physical gestures directed at others exceeds the bounds of fair criticism.

[6] Behavior…that is counter to promoting teamwork.

The ALJ noted the hospital’s code of conduct did not restrict employees’ rights to engage in protected concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act (“Section 7” activity). She also pointed out that it was not promulgated in response to union activity or applied to restrict Section 7 activities.  Thus, the only issue was whether employees would reasonably construe the code of conduct to prohibit Section 7 activity.

In finding rules 4 and 6 unlawful, the ALJ held they may be reasonably interpreted as prohibiting lawful discussions or complaints that are protected by Section 7 of the NLRA.  Although the employer had legitimate concerns about appropriate staff behavior and a legitimate interest in promulgating work rules to maintain a safe atmosphere in the workplace, those portions of the code of conduct were overbroad and ambiguous, the ALJ ruled, even when read in context.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2023National Law Review, Volume IV, Number 66
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

With experienced Workplace Safety and Health attorneys located strategically throughout the nation, we are well-positioned to serve all of an employer’s needs with respect to safety and health programs and compliance issues. We regularly counsel employers on federal and state safety and health statutes and regulations and have extensive expertise with safety and health agencies, including OSHA, MSHA, BATFE, DHS, NIOSH, CSB, NTSB, DOT, FRA, FAA, OPS and Coast Guard matters.

Our attorneys provide practical guidance on all...

703-483-8316
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement