June 20, 2019

June 19, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 18, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Neither City in Illinois Nor Utility Liable Where Pedestrian Was Struck Crossing Street Outside Of Crosswalk Even Though Street Lights Were Not Functioning: Peters v. Riggs

Plaintiff was struck by a vehicle as she crossed a city street and filed suit against the city and its electric utility claiming street lights were not functioning. Defendants moved to dismiss the case because plaintiff was outside of the crosswalk, and therefore, not an intended user of the street. The trial court dismissed the complaint.

The Fourth District affirmed. Plaintiff failed to plead specific facts establishing a duty owed to her by the city. Further, the utility owed no duty for failing to provide illumination where plaintiff was not an intended user of the city street because she crossed in mid-block. Peters v. Riggs, 2015 IL App (4th) 140043.

© 2019 Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Litigation of business and commercial cases is a major focus of Heyl Royster. Our experience encompasses all aspects of commercial dispute resolution - state and federal forums, administrative proceedings, arbitration, and mediation - in almost every area of substantive business law.

309.676.0400