May 23, 2022

Volume XII, Number 143

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 23, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

The New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Its Gap Period Decision

On January 18, 2017, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that municipalities do have an obligation to satisfy the unmet affordable housing obligations arising from 1999 through 2015, the so-called “gap period.”  In a decision that will be hailed as a victory for affordable housing advocates and developers, and a loss for municipalities, the Court held that “the need of presently existing low- and moderate-income households formed during the gap period must be captured and included in setting affordable housing obligations for towns. . . .”  This need will be captured in a redefined “present need,” which previously only included the calculation of overcrowded and deficient housing units.   Thus, the affordable housing units which were lost during the period of time in which COAH failed to deliver a workable set of regulations will not be forever lost.  Once again, the Court welcomed legislative or executive action. Unless and until that happens, the gap period will need to be addressed in a municipal affordable housing plan.

© 2022 Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C. All Rights Reserved National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 18
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Donna A. McBarron, Giordano Halleran Law firm, real estate lawyer, redevelopment attorney
Of Counsel

Donna is of-counsel to the Real Estate and Leasing Departments. She has over 20 years of experience dealing with complex commercial real estate matters, negotiating commercial leases, and has represented multiple municipalities in connection with their affordable housing litigation and compliance. Donna received her BA from Rutgers University and her JD from Rutgers University School of Law.

732-741-3900
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement