October 14, 2019

October 14, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New York Dramatically Changes Harassment/Discrimination Landscape for Employers

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law today a bill which will dramatically alter the way discrimination and harassment claims are treated in New York.

One of the most significant changes arising from the new legislation is that the definition of "employer" under the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) has been revised to remove any reference to a minimum number of employees. The NYSHRL now covers all public and private employers in the state.

The law also removes the longstanding requirement that harassment be "severe or pervasive" before an employer can be held liable. Employers should expect that this change will result in a significant increase in claims. The new standard is far lower. An employer may raise an affirmative defense if the "harassing conduct" is considered, by a "reasonable victim" of the same protected class, to be "petty slights or trivial inconveniences." It remains to be seen what conduct will fall within this category.  While this legislation arose out of concerns about sexual harassment, it will also apply to employees alleging harassment based on race, religion, or any other protected class. 

The amendments further circumscribe the ability of an employer to rely on an employee's failure to report harassment internally since such a failure "will not be determinative of whether [an employer] shall be liable." The revisions leave open the possibility that failure to report may limit the damages an employee may recover, but they nonetheless represent a sea change in how courts evaluate what is generally known as a “Faragher-Ellerth” defense–that is, a defense that the employee failed to take advantage of the employer’s in-house harassment/discrimination complaint procedure and, thus, did not allow the employer to attempt to address the complaint before bringing an action in court or before an administrative agency.

The legislation also expands upon several 2018 amendments to the NYSHRL that previously covered only sexual harassment claims but now will apply to all claims of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation.  The new provisions include:

  • A prohibition on confidential settlement agreements unless confidentiality is the “preference” of the alleged victim, the non-disclosure provisions are written in "plain English," and the victim is provided at least 21 days to consider the provisions;

  • Employer liability for independent contractors and certain other non-employees when the employer, its agents, or supervisors were aware of the harassment of the non-employee and failed to take "immediate and appropriate corrective action"; and

  • A prohibition on employers requiring employees to enter into mandatory arbitration agreements covering discrimination, harassment, or retaliation claims, except where inconsistent with federal law.

The new amendments also change the statute of limitations for filing a sexual harassment claim with the New York State Human Rights Commission from one year to three years. This change is consistent with recent amendments to the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL).

We have seen sweeping changes to the NYSHRL and NYCHRL in the past year. As this trend continues with these new developments, it is imperative for all employers to keep their workplace policies current and ensure that employee trainings are comprehensive and effective

Copyright © by Ballard Spahr LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Denise Keyser Employment Law Attorney Ballard Spahr
Partner

Denise M. Keyser has more than 30 years of experience representing national, regional, and locally based businesses in labor and employment matters, including traditional labor law (such as collective bargaining and arbitrations), OSHA, ERISA, wage and hour, employment-at-will, wrongful discharge, discrimination, management training, executive compensation, and affirmative action.

856-761-3442
Marjoree Peerce Litigator  Criminal Defense Ballard Law FIrm
Partner

Marjorie J. Peerce is a litigator, with a practice focus on white collar criminal defense, regulatory matters, and complex civil litigation. In her more than 30 years of practice, she has handled matters across the criminal and regulatory spectrum. She is Co-Managing Partner of the firm's New York Office.

Ms. Peerce appears in New York state and federal courts, as well as in federal districts around the country. She has handled criminal and regulatory investigations concerning, for example, violations of the Internal Revenue Code, securities fraud (including Bitcoins), the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the Bank Secrecy Act, government contract procurement and subsidy fraud, mail fraud, bribery, accounting fraud, immigration fraud, health care fraud, environmental matters, commodities fraud, computer fraud and hacking, and criminal customs investigations. Ms. Peerce has handled a significant number of matters with the SEC, as well as with FINRA and the CFTC. She has handled numerous matters with the New York Attorney General in a variety of areas. She also regularly represents individuals in myriad matters in the Criminal and Supreme Courts in New York City.

646.346.8039
Christopher Kelly, Ballard Spahr Law Firm, Philadelphia, Labor and Employment Litigation Attorney
Attorney

Christopher J. Kelly is an attorney in Ballard Spahr's Labor and Employment group. Chris has represented both public and private employers in a broad range of litigated matters, including wage and hour, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, whistleblower, breach of contract, unfair competition, and wrongful termination, and employment- and business-related tort claims in both state and federal courts across the country.

Chris has served as lead counsel in a variety of matters and conducted trials to verdict and judgment. He has handled...

215-864-8249
Elliot I. Griffin, Ballard Spahr, Litigation lawyer
Associate

Elliot Imani Griffin is an associate in the Litigation Department who focuses her practice on labor and employment matters. During law school, Elliot interned with Exelon Corporation, a Fortune 100 energy company, where she researched recent National Labor Relations Board decisions to assess how they would impact Exelon's policies. She also wrote demand letters to address fake websites that were allegedly infringing upon the mark of Exelon and its subsidiaries, drafted motions, and assisted in the preparation for Pennsylvania Utility Commission hearings.

Elliot...

215.864.8258