September 27, 2021

Volume XI, Number 270

Advertisement

September 24, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Ninth Circuit Rules California’s ABC Test is Not Preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act

In an April 28, 2021 decision, the Ninth Circuit determined that that the application of California’s ABC test (also known as AB-5) to motor carriers is not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (“F4A”). The ABC test is a judicially-created independent contractor test that was ultimately codified via AB-5. For a more in-depth discussion of AB 5, visit our previous blog post here.

The case, California Trucking Association, et al. v. Rob Bonita, et al., was brought by the trade organization that represents motor carriers who hire independent owner-operators to transport property. CTA sought to enjoin enforcement of AB-5, and in particular, the “B” prong of the ABC test, which states that a worker is an employee unless they perform work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business. In particular, CTA argued that AB-5’s “B” prong contravened F4A’s express preemption of any state law regarding the price, route, or service of any motor carrier. The district court determined that CTA was likely to succeed on the merits of its claim and granted a preliminary injunction.

The Ninth Circuit reversed in a 2-1 opinion, and held that the F4A did not preempt AB-5 because it is a labor law of general applicability that “does not bind, compel, or otherwise freeze into place the prices, routes, or services of motor carriers.” Rather, it affects a motor carrier’s relationship with its workforce. According to the Ninth Circuit, a state law does not have a binding or freezing effect simply because a motor carrier has to consider the law in making business decisions. As such, the law was not “significantly related to rates, routes, or services.”

The Ninth Circuit’s ruling threatens a decades-old practice of motor carriers hiring a workforce of independent-owner operators and classifying them as independent contractors. CTA has stated that it is seeking an en banc rehearing. In the meantime, motor carriers should work with their labor and employment counsel to ensure that they comply with California’s strict requirements regarding independent contractors.

Copyright © 2021, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 144
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Katherine Sandberg Employment Lawyer Hunton Andrews Kurth Law Firm
Associate

Katherine has extensive experience in wage and hour class actions and high-stakes trade secrets litigation. She also has a demonstrated track record of favorable outcomes in federal and state courts for clients facing claims of discrimination, harassment, retaliation and unfair competition. Moreover, she has guided clients through difficult interactions with administrative agencies and claimants to resolve disputes before lawsuits are ever filed.

Katherine also has significant experience defending business owners in public accommodation access litigation involving claims of...

415 975 3705
Christopher Pardo Employment Lawyer Hunton Andrews Kurth
Partner

Chris focuses his practice on the defense of complex employment cases in federal and state courts, arbitration, and before administrative agencies.

He represents a broad range of clients in employment, contractual, and labor matters, particularly in the defense of class and collective actions; complex wage and hour issues; trade secret litigation and restrictive covenant agreements; matters involving race, sex, age, disability, and pregnancy discrimination; wrongful termination; ERISA; RICO; and various state law claims, including wage and discrimination claims under the...

617 648 2759
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement