May 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 142

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

NLRB Clears Path for Unionizing Temporary Workers and Permanent Employees as One Group

The National Labor Relations Board has launched yet another attack on employers who use staffing agencies and external labor sources. The NLRB’s long-awaited decision yesterday in Miller & Anderson makes it much easier for unions to simultaneously represent both the permanent employees of a company and workers from staffing agencies. It does so by eliminating the requirement that both employers -- companies and staffing agencies -- consent to the combined bargaining unit. 

Now the unions will decide whether the groups are represented jointly or separately unless there is an overwhelming showing the groups do not share a sufficient community of interest. Previously, unions seeking to represent both traditional employees and temporary workers in a single unit were required to obtain the consent of both the employer and staffing agency. 

Employers must now confront complex issues of collective bargaining and contract administration that arise from bargaining units covering diverse employment arrangements. For example, an employer that subcontracts with a staffing agency might be forced to simultaneously bargain over both those external employees and its own permanent employees, despite the two groups’ divergent interests on many issues. Staffing agencies and other labor supply companies, on the other hand, could find themselves drawn into labor disputes, whether or not their own employees are involved. 

For companies that use staffing agencies or external labor suppliers, proper planning might prevent a future determination of joint-employer status or of a “community of interest” between internal and external employees. Likewise, staffing agencies themselves will need to be prepared for opportunistic organizing activities by unions and their allies. The Board’s decision to return to a standard not requiring employers’ consent has tremendous reach and opens up greater possibilities for unionization and bargaining efforts. 

© Copyright 2022 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved National Law Review, Volume VI, Number 198
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Robert A Kaiser, Employment, Labor, Attorney, Armstrong Teasdale, Law firm
Partner

Bob Kaiser is a member of the Employment and Labor practice group representing emerging and mature businesses in labor and personnel-related disputes. Because employment and labor laws and regulations continue to evolve, he deftly guides management in creating “fences” and boundaries to assess risks and decrease litigation.

A portion of Bob’s practice includes traditional labor law, a focus he has had for more than 25 years. For small- to mid-sized organizations, he handles labor union relations such as union avoidance, collective bargaining, elections, strikes, picketing and other...

314-342-4153
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement