Ohio Jury in C-8 Exposure Case Awards $1.6M in Compensatory Damages, Denies Punitives
Tuesday, November 10, 2015

An Ohio federal jury in October handed out the first verdict in multi-district litigation (“MDL”) against E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. related to ammonium perfluorooctanoate, or C-8, in drinking water around DuPont’s Washington Works plant in West Virginia.  See Bartlett v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 2:13-cv-170 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2015). The verdict, awarding $1.6 million in compensatory damages to a Plaintiff who alleged her kidney cancer was caused by C-8, is the first in some 3,500 cases in the MDL.

The jury awarded $1.1 million in damages for Plaintiff’s negligence claim and another $500,000 for her emotional distress claim.  In an August 2015 decision, the judge overseeing the MDL held DuPont may face punitive damages.  In re: E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. C-8 Personal Injury Litigation, 2:13-md-2433 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 19, 2015).  DuPont argued it had implemented affirmative and extensive measures to protect and inform the public, including studying the health effects of C-8 and monitoring worker and public exposure to the substance.  But the Court held that “[a] reasonable jury could find the evidence shows that DuPont knew that C-8 was harmful, that it purposefully manipulated or used inadequate scientific studies to support its position, and/or that it provided false information to the public about the dangers of C-8.”  Id. at *10.  The jury here, though, found Plaintiff had not shown that DuPont acted with actual malice, and it rejected Plaintiff’s bid for punitive damages.

 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins