September 19, 2018

September 19, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 18, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 17, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Ohio Physician Assistant Process Streamlined and Burdens Reduced for Employers and Physicians

Among other provisions, the enactment of HB 111 signifies fewer burdens and red tape for employers of physician assistants (PA) and their supervising physicians. Starting September 28, 2018, when the bill becomes effective[1], supervision agreements will no longer need to be filed with and approved in advance by the State Medical Board of Ohio (Board). The new law provides that supervision agreements need only be kept in the records maintained by the supervising physician who entered into the agreement. Additionally, supervision agreements may be amended at any time without seeking Board approval or making additional filings. Lastly, there is no longer a durational limit for supervision agreements, meaning they do not have to be renewed to remain effective. 

Prior to the passage of HB 111, Ohio law consisted of an oftentimes cumbersome process that required filing supervision agreements with the Board and waiting for them to become approved prior to the PA’s commencement of practice for a new employer. This filing and waiting process took time and frequently led to delays in commencement of work, patient access and contributed to scheduling issues. Also, under prior law, supervision agreements had finite terms of two years and required renewal and resubmission of the supervision agreement for Board approval. Further, any amendments had to be filed with the Board, and the amendments did not alter the original agreements’ expiration dates. As a result, these provisions generated large amounts of paperwork and administrative burdens for employers of PAs. The passage of HB 111 should alleviate those issues and streamline utilization of PAs by employers and physicians in Ohio. 

Although there is less oversight from the Board, the substantive requirements for supervision agreements remain the same. Furthermore, the potential punishment for noncompliance is more severe. Previously, the Board could impose civil penalties up to $1,000 for noncompliance. Now, the Board may penalize noncompliance with a fine of up to $5,000. Thus, while the newly enacted legislation is less burdensome, the potential punishments should motivate employers and physicians to comply with the substantive requirements of these agreements.

The Board has provided form agreements for convenience, but physicians and their advisors may draft their own agreements that comply with the law. The link to the form agreements may be found here: http://www.med.ohio.gov/Apply/Physician-Assistant-PA.


[1] The Board reports that it is proactively implementing this law in advance of the effective date.

© 2018 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Eric J. Plinke, Dinsmore Law, Health Care Lawyer, Corporate Attorney
Partner

Eric Plinke is a Partner in the Corporate Department and Health Law Practice Group, and he routinely advises corporate and individual clients regarding a wide-range of health care industry legal issues. He has counseled clients in practice formation and acquisition, hospital and joint venture transactions, hospital and medical practice affiliations, contract review and preparation, compliance programs, HIPAA regulations, scope of practice issues, telemedicine and Stark law and Anti-kickback statutes, as well as significant experience counseling in ambulatory surgery centers and other joint...

614-227-4213
Daniel S. Zinsmaster, Dinsmore Law Firm, Health Care Lawyer
Partner

Dan provides trusted counsel and advocacy to health care clients on a variety of matters, such as corporate compliance, provider credentialing, administrative proceedings and litigation.  He also advises clients on practice formation and acquisition, as well as contract review and preparation.  In recent years, Dan has helped health care companies and providers navigate through fraud and abuse investigations, antitrust reviews, and other white collar criminal matters.  He is a frequent author and lecturer on telehealth and telemedicine issues.

Prior to joining Dinsmore, Dan practiced for nearly seven years with the State Medical Board of Ohio, where he advised board members and agency personnel on issues related to the Medical Practices Act of Ohio, Chapter 119 Administrative Procedures, and federal rules and regulations implicating the area of health care.  His substantial regulatory experience enables him to bring a unique and insightful perspective to handling diverse and complex health care matters, and his thorough understanding of health care laws and policies helps him serve as a valuable resource to corporations, health care associations, hospitals, medical practices and individual practitioners. 

In addition to his experience with federal and state health care regulatory agencies, Dan has successfully aided clients appearing before a number of other administrative or executive entities, including the Ohio Department of Commerce, Accountancy Board of Ohio, and the Ohio Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors.  He previously served as an extern for the Legal Office of the Ohio governor, as well as the Business & Regulations Division of the Columbus city attorney’s office.

(614) 628-6949