January 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 22

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 21, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Declares Acting Secretary’s School Masking Order Void ab initio

In a 4-1 ruling today, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court declared the “Order of the Acting Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Heath Directing Face Coverings in School Entities” (“Masking Order”) void ab initio. The Masking Order, issued on August 31, 2021, directed each person inside a school building to wear a face covering, regardless of vaccination status. 

Challengers argued that the Acting Secretary exceeded her statutory authority and circumvented the requirements set forth in the Commonwealth Documents Law (“CDL”) and Regulatory Review Act (“RRA”) in issuing the Masking Order. The Commonwealth Court agreed. It held that the Masking Order was a regulation that had the force and effect of law because it was a “blanket rule that affects all School Entities in the Commonwealth.” As a regulation, its promulgation was required to be in conformance with the formal rulemaking requirements set forth in the CDL and RRA. These laws require, among other things, agencies to submit proposed regulations to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission for public and legislative comment and proscribe certain time periods pursuant to which proposed regulations either fail or become law. Because the Masking Order was not properly promulgated under the CDL and RRA, the Commonwealth Court decided in favor of Petitioners and deemed the order void ab initio.

The decision comes just two days after Governor Wolf announced that the choice to require face coverings in Pennsylvania’s public schools would likely revert to local leaders in January 2022. We recommend schools consult with their Solicitors about the potential for an appeal and whether or not any changes to their policies should be made at this time.

©2022 Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & GefskyNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 315
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Matthew Morella Attorney Strassburger
Associate

Matthew Morella is an associate attorney at Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Gefsky. Mr. Morella’s area of focus is Education and Public/Non-Profit.

As a 2020 graduate of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Mr. Morella gained valuable experience working in both an environmental law clinic and a low-income taxpayer clinic. As part of his work with the University of Pittsburgh School of Law’s Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic, he wrote a section of Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court focused on General Motors v. the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania....

(412) 281-5423
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement