April 19, 2021

Volume XI, Number 109


April 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

The Portfolio Company Playbook – Chapter 2: Navigating Risk from Conflicts of Interest

Private funds frequently negotiate for special rights when making an investment in a portfolio company, such as the right to appoint one or more board directors, voting rights, and liquidation preferences. Fund sponsors often focus solely on the positive aspects of these special rights, such as increased control, without considering fully other implications. As the Peter Parker principle reminds us, with great power comes great responsibility. In the fund context, sponsors should remember the portfolio company corollary: with greater control comes greater exposure to liability.

Nowhere is the tension between control and liability risk more evident than where sponsors designate their own members as board directors for portfolio companies. The appointment of sponsor personnel to board seats is commonplace. The reasons are simple; among other things, it allows the sponsor to protect the fund’s investment and many sponsors believe it enables them to deliver higher returns to their limited partners.

Where the objectives of the company and the fund align, this arrangement often benefits all parties. However, where the interest of the fund and the portfolio company diverge, or could simply appear to diverge—for example, where a major company transaction or, conversely, insolvency is on the horizon—the appearance of conflicts (and actual conflicts) can arise for sponsor-appointed board designees. This is due in part to the reality that the board designee may owe fiduciary duties to the company and its shareholders on the one hand, and to the fund and its investors on the other. Whether a conflict is real or perceived, it provides a tempting target for would-be plaintiffs at the portfolio company level who may be looking to challenge or invalidate board actions, second guess decision-making with the benefit of hindsight, or otherwise pull the fund, sponsors, and board-designees into litigation as perceived deep pockets.

In addition to major corporate transactions that produce materially different outcomes for different classes of shareholders, every existential threat at a portfolio company almost inevitably leads to claims against the directors and their affiliated private equity sponsor entities. Such claims run the full gamut of corporate activity, from claims arising out of mergers, sales, and insolvencies to claims resulting from data breaches, commercial disputes, regulatory investigations, and industrial accidents causing death, bodily injury, or property damage. The diagram below illustrates how a portfolio company may serve as the fulcrum around which potentially conflicting duties and imperatives of a fund complex may intersect.

Fortunately, fund sponsors can take steps to alleviate the risks associated with perceived conflicts of interests inherent in the dual fiduciary duties owed by sponsor-appointed board designees. First and foremost, sponsors should ensure that their board designees are sensitized to each of the duties they owe and to whom. While board members may owe duties of loyalty and care to the company, and potentially others, the duties they may owe to the fund and its investors can differ depending on, among other things, how the fund is structured, which jurisdiction’s law applies, and what is provided for (or disclaimed) in each entity’s organizational documents. Likewise, sponsors and their board designees should be on the lookout for any possible apparent conflict between the interests of the fund and the portfolio company. In cases of potential conflict, fund personnel should consult with counsel and coordinate with the company as necessary to ensure that procedures are implemented to protect against any argument of perceived or actual conflict tainting an otherwise beneficial transaction or board decision. Such procedures may include the formation of a special committee to evaluate a potential transaction, consultation with minority shareholder groups, and obtaining independent valuations.

© 2021 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 61



About this Author

Timothy W. Mungovan, Litigation Attorney, Proskauer Law Firm

Timothy Mungovan is a Partner in the Litigation Department, co-head of the Private Investment Funds Disputes practice and a member of the Private Investment Funds Group. Tim has an international practice in complex commercial litigation, advising public and private companies in a variety of areas, including securities, corporate governance, fiduciary obligations, investment management and financial services, fraud and trade secrets.

In addition to his regular commercial litigation practice, Tim focuses on disputes involving private investment...

617-526-9412, 212-969-3201
Jonathan M. Weiss Litigation Attorney Proskauer Rose Los Angeles, CA

Jonathan Weiss is a partner in the Litigation Department. Jonathan represents both plaintiffs and defendants in a wide range of high-stakes litigation, including antitrust, class action, financial services, securities and other complex commercial litigation. Jonathan has won multiple noteworthy jury verdicts, including the fourth largest jury award in the history of the State of Arizona (over $110 million), and has significant appellate experience briefing and arguing appeals in both state and federal courts across the nation.

Jonathan has been recognized as a “Rising Star” by...

Michael R. Hackett, Litigation Attorney, Proskauer Law Firm

Michael R. Hackett is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Asset Management Litigation practice. His practice focuses on disputes and regulation involving private funds, including private equity, venture capital, hedge, real estate and private credit funds, as well as other limited partnerships, where he regularly advises funds, fund sponsors, investment advisers and institutional and individual investors.

Mike’s experience representing private fund clients runs the gamut, from control contests within advisers, to...

Alexandra Bargoot, Proskauer Law Firm, Boston, Litigation and Finance Law Attorney

Alexandra Bargoot is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Private Equity & Hedge Fund Litigation Group. Her practice includes a variety of complex commercial litigation matters, with a focus on private investments funds, involving both private disputes and regulatory issues.

Alexandra assists clients on matters involving SEC investigations, pay to play violations, private actions, sales of investments, investigations of aiding and abetting, arbitration award enforcement, among other areas of expertise.


Adam Deming is an associate in the Litigation Department.