October 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 290

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Price Gouging Weekly Roundup: Week of April 26, 2021

Price gouging enforcement and litigation is front and center for company counsel and business managers nationwide. Our weekly round up highlights some of the most relevant news and information for our clients and friends.

Ohio City Caps “Third Party” Food Delivery Fees

The city of Cleveland Heights passed an ordinance placing a 15% cap on fees charged for delivery and pickup orders placed with third-party food delivery services. The city council unanimously voted to institute the limit after hearing that some food delivery services could charge 30% commissions above the regular restaurant price. According to City Council Vice President Kahlil Seren, the “astronomical” delivery fees are akin to extreme price increases on emergency supplies during shortages. As with similar ordinances enacted in Cleveland and Columbus, the Cleveland Heights pricing restriction remains in effect up to 90 days after the Governor lifts the statewide health emergency declared in March 2020. As we’ve discussed in earlier postings, similar caps have been instated in several large cities.

Prosecutors Point to Businessman’s Text Messages in Price Gouging Case

Filings in federal court in Chicago reveal that a local businessman facing price gouging allegations sent incriminating text messages bragging about his financial gains. The owner of a health supply store, allegedly wrote “I made a quarter-million dollars last week…profit on masks…who is going to report me?”  Prosecutors allege the man, in March 2020, purchased 79,160 respirator masks for between $4.27 to $7 each and later sold 11,492 of the masks for prices up to $19.95 each. He has been charged under federal law prohibiting accumulating scarce items during a national emergency in order to resell those items “in excess of prevailing market prices.” In his defense, the businessman argues that the federal government had offered no guidance on “prevailing market prices” in March and April of 2020.

California Grocer Pleads Guilty to Price Gouging

A grocery store in Pleasanton, California pled guilty to two counts of price gouging relating to food items such as instant noodles, tea, yellow onions, and red yams. County and state prosecutors filed the charges against the store, following an investigation and allegations of 60-400% price increases after the California Governor declared a state of emergency on March 4, 2020. The grocery will donate $20,000 to the Alameda County Community Food Bank, pay a $240 fine for restitution, and spend a year under probation. California has since relaxed some of its pricing restrictions.

Chicago’s Third Party Delivery Fee Cap Has Expired

In November 2020, the City of Chicago passed an ordinance to limit the amount of fees third-party delivery services could charge for restaurant orders. The ordinance was due to sunset when indoor dining capacity reached 40% for 60 consecutive days, a milestone achieved this past weekend. Last weekend, that 15% cap was removed. The members of the City Council have proposed reinstituting the pricing limits and extending them until the fall. The draft resolution has not been voted on.

© 2021 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 116
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Christopher Ondeck Antitrust Litigator chair of  Proskauer Rose nationwide Antitrust Group
Partner

Chris Ondeck is a partner in the Litigation Department and vice-chair of the Antitrust Group. He focuses his practice on representing clients in civil and criminal antitrust litigation, defending mergers and acquisitions before the U.S. antitrust agencies, defending companies involved in government investigations, and providing antitrust counseling.

Chris has handled antitrust matters for clients in a number of industries, including advertising, aerospace, alcoholic beverages, appliances, building materials, defense, medical devices, metals,...

202-416-5865
John Ingrassia, Antitrust Attorney, Telecommunications, Proskauer Law firm
Special Counsel

John Ingrassia is a special counsel and advises clients on a wide range of antitrust matters in various industries, including chemicals, pharmaceutical, medical devices, telecommunications, financial services, health care, and others. His practice includes a significant focus on the analysis of Hart-Scott-Rodino pre-merger notification requirements, the coordination and submission of Hart-Scott-Rodino filings, and the analysis and resolution of antitrust issues related to mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures. John has extensive experience with the legal, practical,...

202.416.6869
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement