October 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 290

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

PTAB Presses Pause On All Arthrex Remands

On Friday, May 1, 2020, Chief Administrative Patent Judge Scott R. Boalick of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) paused all activity in the significant number of PTAB cases remanded to it from the Federal Circuit under Arthrex (discussed here).  CAPJ Boalick’s General Order will remain in effect until the U.S. Supreme Court considers the constitutional issue raised in Arthrex.  Specifically, with this General Order, the PTAB has ordered over 100 PTAB cases and any additional cases remanded to it under Arthrex to be held in abeyance “[t]o avoid burdening the Office and the parties” “until the Supreme Court acts on a petition for certiorari or the time for filing such petition expires.”

For background, last October, the Federal Circuit ruled that Administrative Patent Judges (“APJ”), who preside over all post grant proceedings at the PTAB, were appointed in violation of the Apportionments Clause because, among other things, both the Secretary of Commerce and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office lacked unfettered removal authority over the APJs.  To remedy this, the Federal Circuit severed the employment protections provided to APJs under the AIA, vacated the PTAB’s final decision, and remanded the case back to the PTAB for further proceedings under a new constitutionally-approved PTAB panel.

Since Arthrex, all decisions in post grant proceedings that were decided pre-Arthrex but have been appealed post-Arthrex are being vacated by the Federal Circuit and remanded back to the PTAB for further proceedings before newly-designated PTAB panels.  To date, this has resulted in over 100 decisions that have been vacated and remanded to the PTAB, with more such orders to be expected.

Accordingly, to avoid this flood of remanded cases, all cases current and future that are remanded under Arthrex are now put on hold until the Supreme Court has a chance to review the Federal Circuit’s Arthrex decision, which the Federal Circuit recently denied en banc review in March.  Assuming Arthrex appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, which it has said it intends to do, PTAB proceedings that were vacated and remanded in view of Arthrex may be on hold until this fall, if the petition for certiorari is denied, or the following calendar year if the Supreme Court takes the case.  Deadlines for petitions for certiorari have been extended from 90 days to 150 days by the Supreme Court in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and thus any such petitions are now due in August.

©1994-2021 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 133
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Daniel B. Weinger Patent Litigation Attorney Mintz Law Firm
Member

Daniel's practice in intellectual property focuses on patent litigation, both at the International Trade Commission and the Federal District Courts. Daniel has participated in all phases of patent litigation, including active engagement in multiple evidentiary hearings at the International Trade Commission. He has done work in a variety of technology areas, including computer software, software architecture, GPS, network devices, semiconductors, converged devices, and LED lighting.

Prior to joining Mintz Levin, Daniel worked as a database...

617-348-1629
Matthew S. Galica, Mintz Levin, Technology Specialist, Software Development lawyer, Application architect, Attorney
Associate

Matt focuses his intellectual property practice on patent litigation, strategic IP counseling, and patent valuation.  He has experience representing clients before the International Trade Commission (ITC), Federal district courts, and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.  Matt’s practice covers complex technologies such as microprocessors, graphics processors, RF circuitry, LCD display systems, microelectromechanical systems, audio and video processing, VLSI design, consumer telecommunications systems, and DDR-compliant memory modules and DRAM.

Matt has held lead roles in multiple ITC...

617.348.4859
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement