November 17, 2018

November 16, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 15, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Report Issued On Two-For-One Executive Order, But What About The SEC?

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs recently published a report on the fiscal 2018 results of President Trump's Executive Order 13771 (Jan. 30, 2017) requiring federal agencies and departments to, among other things, eliminate two regulatory actions for each new regulatory action.  According to the OIRA, agencies issued 176 deregulatory actions and 14 significant regulatory actions.  The ratio of significant deregulatory  actions to significant regulatory actions was 4 to 1. 

The OIRA's report includes a chart lists the federal departments and agencies and the numbers of deregulatory and regulatory actions taken by each together with the present value of the costs or cost savings associated with those actions.  The Department of Health and Human Services took the most deregulatory actions (25) followed closely by the Department of Education (24) and Department of Transportation (23). 

Notably, the Securities and Exchange Commission does not appear in the OIRA's chart.  The President's Executive Order imposes the two-for-one requirement on each "executive department or agency".  That would seem to include the Securities and Exchange Commission.  However, guidance subsequently issued by the Office of Management and Budget limited its excludes "independent agencies" as defined in 44 U.S.C. § 3502(5). That statute lists the SEC as an independent agency, even though it may not be truly independent.  See  How Independent Is The SEC And How Independent Should It Be?

© 2010-2018 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Paul Bishop is a partner in Allen Matkins' Corporate and Securities practice group, and works out of the Orange County office. He represents clients in a wide range of corporate transactions, including public and private securities offerings of debt and equity, mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests and tender offers, corporate governance matters and federal and state securities laws (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Act), investment adviser, financial services regulation, and California administrative law. He regularly advises clients...

949-851-5428