June 27, 2022

Volume XII, Number 178

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

SEC Greenlights Board Diversity Requirements

After much debate, the SEC on Friday approved a Nasdaq proposal that will require listed companies to adopt several diversity-related measures.  Nasdaq first made this proposal, which requires listed companies to publicly disclose diversity information about their board members and either hire “diverse” members to their boards or explain why they do not in writing, last December.  Under SEC regulations, self-regulatory organizations such as Nasdaq must formally submit proposed rule changes to the Commission.  Nasdaq made some minor revisions to the proposed rule in February that granted smaller boards and newly listed companies some compliance leeway, but the proposal has otherwise survived scrutiny from conservatives, corporate interests, and popular newspaper editorial boards.

New SEC Chair Gary Gensler said the rule “will allow investors to gain a better understanding of Nasdaq-listed companies’ approach to board diversity, while ensuring that those companies have the flexibility to make decisions that best serve their shareholders.”  The Commission had punted a decision on the rule in March prior to Gensler’s confirmation by the United States Senate.

With the adoption of the new rule, most companies listed on the exchange will have to hire (a) at least one director who self-identifies as female, and (b) one director who self-identifies and Black or African American, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, two or more races or ethnicities, or LGBTQ+.  Nasdaq said the proposal will “encourage the creation of more diverse boards through a market-led solution,” though others disagreed.

It remains to be seen whether the new rule will face any sort of legal challenge.  As we previously reported, Senate Republicans criticized the plan in February, claiming it was inconsistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The order approving the new rule, however, explicitly holds otherwise.  Check back here for continued reports on challenges and implementation of this rule.

© 2022 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 222
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Joseph S. Hartunian Litigation Attorney Proskauer Law Firm
Associate

Joe Hartunian earned his J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was an executive editor of the Michigan Journal of Law Reform. While at Michigan, Joe worked as a legal intern for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York.

Prior to law school, Joe served as a legislative aide for Senator Charles E. Schumer on the Senate Judiciary Committee, focusing on issues related to opioid abuse, telecommunications and gun safety. Upon graduation, he returned to the committee as an advisor to Senator Amy Klobuchar on the nomination of now-Justice...

202-416-6859
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement