October 27, 2020

Volume X, Number 301

Advertisement

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Senate ENR Committee Holds Hearing on FERC Commissioner Nominees

On September 16, 2020, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources (ENR) Committee held a hearing to consider the nominations of Mark Christie and Allison Clements to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  Chairman Murkowski and Ranking Member Manchin focused their preliminary comments on the importance of ensuring that FERC has a full complement of five Commissioners and expressed interest in acting quickly to move through the confirmation process.  However, there was no indication of the specific timing of the Senate ENR and floor votes that would be required to confirm the nominees.  Several Senators praised both Christie and Clements, and no Senator expressed opposition to the nominees, though Clements received a few pointed questions from Senators Gardner and Lee about her time at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Both Christie and Clements avoided taking controversial stances, and, in line with the practice in such hearings, the nominees avoided comment on cases that are or could come before the Commission.  The hearing largely focused on issues arising from FERC’s role in the electric industry, including the changing mix of generating resources, issues with grid reliability (and in particular, the recent California blackouts), cybersecurity threats, carbon pricing in the regional markets, and the dependence of the electric grid on natural gas pipelines.  Both nominees repeatedly expressed support for FERC’s longstanding commitment to fuel and resource neutrality, emphasized the importance of a diverse mix of resources, and highlighted the role reserved to the states under the Federal Power Act to guide generation development.  In response to a question on FERC’s role in protecting markets from manipulation, Christie highlighted the role of market monitors and the necessity of enforcement.

The hearing also focused substantial attention on infrastructure projects, and especially on FERC’s role in permitting natural gas pipelines and LNG terminals.  Clements and Christie pledged to consider applications under Sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act based on the facts developed in the record, and each expressed an appreciation for the gravity of decisions that grant eminent domain authority and that seriously affect landowners.  Senators also touched on the question of whether downstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are reasonably foreseeable in a NEPA analysis – an issued that was addressed, in part, in the DC Circuit’s 2017 Sabal Trail decision.  In response to a question from Senator Lee, Clements stated that she understood the relevant precedent to mean that downstream GHG emissions were reasonably foreseeable.  In an exchange with Senator Heinrich, Christie stated that he did not want to pre-judge requirements imposed by the Sabal Trail decision.  As to specific projects, Senator Wyden asked Clements about the Jordan Cove LNG export facility.  In response, Clementspointed out that the  Department of Energy (not FERC) determined whether exports were in the public interest and focused on FERC’s statutory role in approving the LNG facility if merited by the facts.

Neither nominee commented on Senator Cortez Masto’s questions regarding FERC’s recent issuance of preliminary permits for the proposed Walker Lake pumped hydropower facility in western Nevada, except to commit to careful review of the facts.

Copyright 2020 K & L GatesNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 262
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Of Counsel

Kimberly Frank is counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, and is a member of the power practice group. Kimberly represents clients in a broad array of electric utility regulatory matters before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and state regulatory agencies and in appeals of these agencies’ decisions.

Kimberly helps clients navigate the complex rules of the FERC-regulated regional wholesale markets. She helps them evaluate and advocate for rule changes in the energy, capacity, and ancillary services markets administered by the regional transmission organizations...

202.778.9064
Sandra Safro, KL Gates Law Firm, Energy Attorney
Partner

Ms. Safro is a partner in the firm's Washington, D.C. office. She focuses her practice on regulatory, policy, and transactional issues related primarily to natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), crude oil, and natural gas liquids (NGLs). Ms. Safro regularly advises clients on matters related to commodity and pipeline transportation issues, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) policies related to capacity release and in the negotiation of precedent agreements, negotiated rate agreements, asset management arrangements, transportation service agreements, and the terms and conditions of service included in pipeline tariffs. Ms. Safro also advises clients on, issues related to the import and export of LNG, including commercial agreements related to terminal capacity, developments on Capitol Hill, and proceedings before FERC and the Department of Energy (DOE). She represents clients in natural gas and oil pipeline rate proceedings before the FERC and state agencies and advises clients on pipeline safety issues before the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

202-778-9178
David Wochner, KL Gates Law Firm, Public Policy Attorney
Practice Area Leader

Mr. Wochner has advised, represented and advocated on behalf of clients on natural gas, LNG and oil related matters, including natural gas and oil commodity and pipeline transportation issues, LNG imports and exports, and natural gas as a transportation fuel, before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Departments of Energy, Transportation and the Interior, EPA and on Capitol Hill. He served as lead Washington counsel on behalf of a major international drilling company in multiple Congressional and federal agency investigations and hearings related to the...

202-778-9014
Patrick T. Metz Power Attorney K&L Gates Washington DC
Associate

Patrick Metz is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the power practice group. Mr. Metz practices before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and state public utility commissions, focusing on complex regulatory matters associated with the generation, transmission, distribution, and storage of electric energy, as well as the transportation and distribution of natural gas. Mr. Metz has represented clients in ratemaking, complaint, merger, and rulemaking proceedings, including those related to RTO/ISO tariff compliance, cost allocation, PURPA, transmission...

202.778.9056
Advertisement
Advertisement