Skip to main content

February 9, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 40

National Law Review
  • Login
  • Mdn
  • FB
  • twt
  • link
  • home
  • rss
  • logo
  • Publish / Advertise with Us
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Join Our Team
    • Search
  • Trending Legal News
    • Most Recent
    • Legal News Podcast
    • What's Trending
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • NLR Blog
    • Search
  • About Us
    • About the NLR
    • NLR Team
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • NLR Thought Leadership Awards
      • 2018
      • 2019
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Search
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Search
  • Quick Links
    • Legal News Podcast
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Search
  • ENEWSBULLETINS

58

New Articles
Bottom Row Image
Advertisement

February 08, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • Practical Implications of Travelers v. ICS for Cyber Insurance... by: Richard J. Bortnick and Jonathan E. Meer
  • Trending in Telehealth: January 24, 2023 – February 5, 2023 by: Amanda Enyeart and Abby Higgins
  • Biometric Claims Subject to Five-Year Statute of Limitations Under... by: Kaitlin E. Gallen
  • Scope 3 To Be Or Not To Be? That Is The ESG Question by: Bruce White
  • Washed Up: Tension Between Offshore Wind Development and Marine... by: Meghan E. Smith and Marisa Del Turco
  • What is a Disaster Communication Plan? by: John S. Prisco
  • DOJ Drops Ball on Fraud Cases: 2022 FCA Stats a “Disgrace” by: Mary Jane Wilmoth
  • CMS May Soon Be Asking: "When Did You Know?" As it Proposes... by: Timothy Cahill and Ashley E. Durner
  • Cultured Meat 101: The Science and Premarket Process by: L. Christine Lawson
  • Pomp and Positioning: The State of the Union Address, 2023 by: Beth L. Goldstein and Jeffrey L. Turner
  • THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMMM! CFPB Circulated An Advisory Opinion On... by: Angelika Munger
  • US Executive Branch Update – February 8, 2023 by: Stacy A. Swanson
  • Hydro Newsletter - Volume 10, Issue 1 by: April Knight and Liberty Quihuis
  • To Be, or Not to Be? Considerations for A.I.- Generated Art by: Art Law Practice
  • Gaming Operators Latest to See Specific Privacy & Cybersecurity... by: Julia K. Kadish
  • ICYMI: HIPAA and Social Media IRL by: Michael D. Sutton and Sara Helene Shanti
  • “Metabirkin” NFT Maker Liable in TM Dispute by: Terrance D. Roberts
  • Do Lawyers Use CRM? by: Cate Giordano
  • DOJ Withdraws Long-Standing Support for Antitrust Enforcement Policy... by: Jeremy R. Morris and E. John Steren
  • New York Finalizes Commercial Lending Disclosure Regulations by: Alex McFall and Christopher K. Friedman
  • Web Tracking Creates a Web of Data Privacy Risks by: Sara Helene Shanti and Lourdes Martinez
  • Labor Secretary Walsh Expected to Leave DOL for NHL by: Jeffrey W. Brecher and Justin R. Barnes
  • MEDICREDIT AGREES TO PAY ~$2MM TO SETTLE TCPA CLAIM: Greenwald’s Firm... by: Eric J. Troutman
  • The Long-Awaited End of the Tolling of Plan Deadlines due to COVID-19 by: Roberta K Chevlowe
  • No Surprises Act and Three Takeaways on Surprise Billing by: Alden J. Bianchi and Sarah G. Raaii
  • Black History Month and Venture Capital [VIDEO] by: Frederick Von Bryant II
  • The Granite State Implements the Nation’s First Voluntary Paid Family... by: Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper and Ashley Krezmien
  • What to Do When You Receive a Legal Complaint by: Thomas Kane and Maximilian D. Cadmus
  • When do you need a Chief Data Officer (CDO)? by: Jeffrey T. Hunter
  • DOJ Withdraws Key Healthcare Antitrust Enforcement Guidance: Where to... by: Kelly A. Leahy and Joseph D. Wheeler
  • The Fifth Circuit Mulls “Ultimate Employment Decision” Rule Under... by: Holly H. Williamson and J. Marshall Horton
  • Tightening the Cordon – U.S. Restricts Licensing Policy and Adds... by: Reid Whitten and Julien Blanquart
  • Age/National Origin Case Was Properly Dismissed Despite “Direct... by: Anthony J Oncidi
  • Whistleblower Risks in an Economic Downturn, Whistleblower Protection... by: Gregory (Greg) Keating and Melissa L. Jampol
  • Combatting Financial Crime in the Metaverse by: Andrew Pimlott
  • Congressional Scrutiny of ‘Big Tech’ Builds on Bipartisan China Focus by: Pablo E. Carrillo and Michael D. Hawthorne
  • “First-of-Its-Kind” FTC Breach Enforcement Case on Hot-Button Website... by: Iliana L. Peters
  • The Fiduciary Duty and Confidentiality Among Umbrella/Master... by: John S. Prisco
  • The SEC and State Regulators Target Crypto Lending in Nexo Settlement by: F. Phillip Hosp V and Patrick D. Daugherty
  • Against the Evidence: How the FTC Cast Aside the Input of Experts at... by: Erik J. Winton and Clifford R. Atlas
  • Employers Prepare for Thawing ERISA Deadlines by: Jessica E. Kuester and Hillary M. Sizer
  • Potential Impact on the French Legal System of the Draft EU Directive... by: Arnaud Moussatoff
  • The Expiration of California COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave by: Janella T. Gholian and Julie L. Gottshall
  • Pennsylvanian Immigration Detention Center Shuts Down, Raising... by: Raymond G. Lahoud
  • PCRM Will Hold Webinar Series on “Tomorrow’s Data Today: Sunsetting... by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • Gold Dome Report – Legislative Day 14 (2023) by: Stanley S. Jones, Jr. and Helen L. Sloat
  • OFCCP’s New February 17 Deadline for Asserting Objections to EEO-1... by: Lauren B. Hicks
  • Australia: APRA Provides Insight Into 2023 Priorities by: Jim Bulling
  • U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights Publishes DEI... by: Monica H. Khetarpal and Susan D. Friedfel
  • Delaware Court of Chancery Holds that Officers of a Delaware... by: Alejandro E. Moreno and Eugene Choi
  • District Court Declares Portion of Regulations Governing NSA’s... by: Shams Hirji and Max Czernin
  • California Legislators Propose Three Climate Bills Focused on ESG... by: Jacob H. Hupart
  • China’s Supreme People’s Court: Patentee Entitled to Punitive Damages... by: Aaron Wininger
  • Update: OFCCP Extends Deadline for Contractors to Confirm Objection... by: Laura A. Mitchell
  • OSHA Serves Up a Slice of Confusion: Can an Employer’s Pizza Party... by: John Surma and Jeff T. Leslie
  • The EEOC Releases Updated Guidance on Hearing Disabilities and the ADA by: Audrey H. Shinn
  • SEC Probes into Advisers' Compliance with the Custody Rule for... by: Gavin Fearey
  • In Defense Of Putting Profits Forward by: Keith Paul Bishop

February 07, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • CIPL Responds to UK Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum (DRCF)... by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • The EU’s Tobacco Products Directive: Revisiting the Requirements and... by: Packaging Law at Keller and Heckman
  • It’s About Damn Time by: Jodi Stein and E. Gail Suchman
  • OFCCP Proposes Two-Step Complaint Intake Process by: Lauren B. Hicks and Zachary V. Zagger
  • CNIL Weighs in On GDPR Applicability to US Company by: Liisa M. Thomas
  • Environmental Auditing, With Tim Wilkins [PODCAST] by: Daniel J. Pope and Timothy A. Wilkins
  • SEC Issues New C&DIs Regarding Form 10-K “Clawback” Checkboxes by: Erin Reeves McGinnis and Adam Marshall
  • OFCCP Extends Deadline for Contractors to Object to Release of EEO-1... by: Guy Brenner and Olympia Karageorgiou
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court Addresses "Occurrence" in Case... by: Blayne Nicole Christy and Mollie T. Kugler
  • Out with the Old: The Antitrust Division Withdraws Healthcare... by: Bruce D. Sokler and Joseph M. Miller
  • Public Health Emergency Ends May 11: What Telehealth Companies Need... by: Thomas B. Ferrante and Rachel B. Goodman
  • New Illinois Leave Law: Paid Leave for Any Reason by: Michael S. Arnold and Danielle M. Bereznay
  • Platform Companies: An Evolution of Real Estate Joint Ventures by: David L. Coombs and Jason E. Dunn
  • Michigan Bankruptcy Exemptions Set to Rise Significantly on March 1 by: Ronald A. Spinner and Marc N. Swanson
  • US Executive Branch Update – February 7, 2023 by: Stacy A. Swanson
  • Foley Automotive Update 7 February 2023 by: Ann Marie Uetz and Vanessa L. Miller
  • Finally, Judicial Guidance Interpreting the Massachusetts... by: Geri L. Haight and Natalie C. Groot
  • Private Investment Diligence and Fraud Prevention: Will New... by: Andrew A. Howell and Shabbi S. Khan
  • 2023 Report on FINRA’s Examination and Risk Monitoring Program by: Richard M. Cutshall and Arthur Don
  • “I Don’t Recall” Is Not Sufficient to Avoid a Handwritten Signature... by: Kate Gold and Philippe A. Lebel
  • Deadline to Comply with Requirements of Mexico's Wastewater... by: Alejandro Nemo Gomez Strozzi and Marco Antonio Najera Martinez
  • New York Department of Financial Services Issues Guidance on... by: Jason H. Finger and Timothy Q. Karcher
  • AP GAS & ELECTRIC FIGHTS BACK AGAINST TCPA CLAIMS: Western... by: Brittany A. Andres
  • Will the Tennessee Legislature Continue to Leave Cannabis to Outlaw... by: J. Hunter Robinson and Savannah Kolodziej
  • Are companies prohibited from making choices based on profiling? by: David A. Zetoony
  • Judge: Starbucks Illegally Threatened Workers During Union Campaign by: David J. Pryzbylski
  • Time Is Money: A Quick Wage-Hour Tip on … Gap-Time Claims by: Eduardo J. Quiroga
  • Setting S-M-A-R-T Goals for Future Success and Satisfaction by: Anjali D. Desai
  • Increased Risks, D&O Insurance Considerations, Following Delaware... by: Geoffrey B. Fehling and Casey L. Coffey
  • Extended Notice and Required Severance: Expansions to New Jersey’s... by: Lindsay Ditlow and Michelle S. Strowhiro
  • FTC Announces Public Forum on Proposed Noncompete Ban by: Peter A. Steinmeyer and Erik W. Weibust
  • Increasing Economies of Scale Through Combining AI With SaaS by: Christopher J. McKenna
  • USDA Announces Proposed Changes to School Meal Program by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • California Privacy Protection Agency Board Adopts and Approves CCPA... by: Brian G. Cesaratto and Alexander J. Franchilli
  • This Is Your (Antitrust) Captain Speaking: Fasten Your Seatbelt and... by: Jennifer P.M. Marsh and Mélanie Bruneau
  • Does Your Product Use HFCs? Are You Ready for a Phase-Out? by: Erik K. Swanholt and Amanda K. Beggs
  • Beware of “Be Mine” in the Workplace by: Abby M. Warren
  • Telecom Alert: CPNI Certifications Due; USDA Invests $2.7B in... by: Jim Baller and Sean Stokes
  • FTC Brings Enforcement Action under FTC Act and Health Breach... by: Brian G. Cesaratto and Alexander J. Franchilli
  • Ill. Supreme Court: All BIPA Claims Have a Five-Year Statute of... by: Steven J Pearlman and Alexandra S. Oxyer
  • Litigation Minute: Ethylene Oxide— What It Is and Why You Should Care... by: David A. Fusco and Wesley A. Prichard
  • EPA Releases Improved Calculators to Measure Impact of P2 Activities by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • New UCC Article 12: Foreseeable Issues with Using Cryptocurrencies... by: Jeonghoon Ha and Robin J. Miles
  • Cybersecurity Technology Licensor Beats Securities Fraud Suit, but... by: Kristin L. Bryan and James Brennan
  • DOJ Withdraws Policy Statements That Defined Limited Safe Harbor for... by: Elizabeth A. N. Haas and Benjamin R. Dryden
  • When They’ve Got to Go (Let Them): What Employers Should Know about... by: Ryan Bykerk and Taylor Hall
  • Cal/OSHA COVID-19 Prevention Non-Emergency Regulations Have Taken... by: Joshua M. Henderson and Sean Paisan
  • Clash of the Titans: SEC Sues Genesis and Gemini for Digital Asset... by: Richard B Levin and Kevin Tran
  • OFSI Annual Review: April 2021 to August 2022 by: Rosie Naylor and Michael E. Ruck
  • Ten Rules For Group Decision Making By The Man Who Wrote The Book by: Keith Paul Bishop

February 06, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • NNI Publishes Supplement to the President’s 2023 Budget Request by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • This Week in 340B: January 31 – February 6, 2023 by: Emily J. Cook and Reuben Bank
  • SECURE 2.0 Series Part 9: Now It’s Easier Than Ever to Clean Up Those... by: Craig A. Day
  • Announcement: Recent Regulatory Agendas Show Numerous Delayed Awaited... by: Gregory R. Wall and Matthew Z. Leopold
  • Class Actions 101 by: Hassan A. Zavareei
  • EEOC Releases Comprehensive Guidance Regarding Job Applicants and... by: Emily K. Harvin
  • FTC Extends ‘Green Guides’ Comment Period to April 24 by: Laura Siegel Rabinowitz and Donald S. Stein
  • Massachusetts Paid Family and Medical Leave Act Update by: Sara J. Higgins
  • New Jersey’s Expanded WARN Obligation to Take Effect in April 2023 by: Carrie Hoffman
  • OSHA Increases Maximum Penalties and Announces Significant New... by: Brian Hurt and William J. Wahoff
  • Department of Justice Withdraws Key Healthcare Antitrust Policy... by: John D. Carroll and David R. Garcia
  • Illinois Supreme Court: All BIPA Claims Subject to Five-Year Statute... by: Robert D. Boley and Paula M. Ketcham
  • Federal Communications Commission Authorizes Use of Automated and... by: Paul C. Besozzi
  • Check the List: Is OFCCP Ready to Release Your Company’s EEO-1 Report? by: Lauren B. Hicks
  • Illinois Supreme Court Rules on BIPA Class Action Lawsuit by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • The RADV Final Rule and Advance Notice of CY 2024 Capitation Rates:... by: Christine Burke Worthen and Mike Segal
  • Who Has My Data? EU Court Rules GDPR Requires Disclosure of Data... by: Benjamin William Perry and Rachel M. LaBruyere
  • EEOC Announces Enforcement Priorities for 2023-2027 by: Dan Syed
  • Weekly IRS Roundup January 30 – February 3, 2023 by: Sarah M. Raben
  • Delaware Court of Chancery Determines that Corporate Officers Owe... by: Frank M. Placenti and Barbara A. Jones
  • 100% That’s My Trademark: Common Terms Can Be Source Identifiers... by: Matthew J. Smith
  • How to Use "Voice of Customer" Data to Better Market Your... by: Meranda M. Vieyra
  • San Francisco Passes Ordinance Mandating Paid Military Leave by: Harold R. Jones and Melissa J. Kendra
  • CPPA Board Votes to Send Final CPRA Regs to the Office of... by: Alan L. Friel and Elizabeth A. Spencer Berthiaume
  • Weekly Bankruptcy Alert February 6, 2023 by: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
  • Title 22 is Governing Law in California – Think Twice Before Adopting... by: Rebecca B. Hoyes and Tish R. Pickett
  • DOJ Withdraws Long-Standing Health Care Antitrust Enforcement Policy... by: E. John Steren and Patricia M. Wagner
  • Impressing a Robot: EEOC Takes a Byte Out of AI Based Hiring (US) by: Labor and Employment Practice Group Squire Patton Boggs
  • California Attorney General’s New Privacy Enforcement Targets are... by: Jason C. Gavejian and Joseph J. Lazzarotti
  • CPPA Approves Proposed Final CPRA Regulations for Submission to OAL by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Powered By Foley Episode 5: Projects & Money Recap – Growth and... by: Natalie S. Neals and Darin M. Lowder
  • ATDS CASE AGAINST DMS PROCEEDS: Pro Per Plaintiff Scores Unusual... by: Eric J. Troutman
  • Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 Extends Telehealth Waivers by: Gina L. Bertolini and Leah D'Aurora Richardson
  • New and Greener ROZ Template by: David van Dijk and Barbara Klootwijk
  • California Court Upholds Percentage Bonus, Without Recalculating... by: Paul R. Lynd
  • Cardiology: The New Darling of Private Equity Investment by: Roger D. Strode
  • Kerry Inc. Pleads Guilty to Unsanitary Manufacturing Charges for... by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • Honchariw: The Enforceability of Late Fees in California by: Julie A. Schoepf and Marci L. Morgan Cox
  • Operation Nightingale: Fraudulent Nursing Diploma Scheme and Its... by: Sophia Temis
  • 2024 New York Budget Proposes Wide-Ranging Transaction Approval... by: David Manko and Jonian Rafti
  • Even-handed Thievery: SEC Sanctions Unregistered Investment Adviser... by: Peter D. Hutcheon
  • Sanctions Update—January 2023 by: Rosie Naylor and Michael E. Ruck
  • CFPB Hosts Hearing on Appraisal Bias by: James W. Wright, Jr. and Britney M. Crawford
  • Abusive Arbitrage Devices – It’s Time to Get Reacquainted by: Cynthia C. Mog
  • Available Options for Completing Form I-9 in Remote-Work Scenarios by: Caterina Cappellari
  • CIPA SUNDAY: Google Wins On Motion to Dismiss CIPA Claim! by: Brittany A. Andres
  • Assembly Member Takes Another Run At Digital Financial Asset Law by: Keith Paul Bishop

Article By

Daniel J Davis

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Whistleblower Defense
Proskauer Rose LLP, Law Firm, business law

Related Practices & Jurisdictions


  • Government Contracts, Maritime & Military Law
  • Labor & Employment
  • Litigation / Trial Practice
  • 7th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Tweet
Advertisement

Seventh Circuit Issues Ruling Interpreting False Claim Act Whistleblower Amendments

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

The Seventh Circuit recently issued a decision interpreting the anti-retaliation provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA).  The decision provides important clarifications about how courts may interpret recent amendments to this provision.  Like a recent decision by the Fourth Circuit, the Seventh Circuit finds that courts may inquire whether the employee’s underlying complaint of FCA fraud was objectively and subjectively reasonable.  Using that standard, the Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s dismissal of the whistleblower’s claim on a motion for summary judgment. 

The FCA’s two key liability provisions apply to any person (1) who “knowingly presents . . . to an officer or employee of the United States Government . . . a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval” or (2) who “knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the Government.” 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)-(2).  The FCA’s anti-retaliation provision protects7th circuit employee conduct “in furtherance of an action under this section or other efforts to stop 1 or more violations of this subchapter.”  Thus, an employee potentially can demonstrate “protected activity” either by showing steps taken (1) in furtherance of an FCA action or (2) to stop a violation of the FCA.

In Uhlig v. Fluor Corporation, the Seventh Circuit addressed when an employee has satisfied his burden of establishing that he engaged in protected activity.  Uhlig – an electrician –claimed the company defrauded the government by failing to follow its alleged contractual obligations regarding the qualifications of electricians performing work in Afghanistan and terminated him for complaining about the alleged breach.

In dismissing Uhlig’s claim, the Seventh Circuit explained that protected activity has both a subjective and objective component. Subjectively, an employee must show that he believed in good faith that the company was committing or had committed fraud on the government.  Objectively, the plaintiff must show that a reasonable employee in the same circumstance would have reasonably believed that the employer was committing or had committed fraud against the government.  Important to this analysis, the Seventh Circuit recognized that the “objective” prong was limited to an analysis of the facts known to the plaintiff at the time of the protected activity.

Applying this standard, the Seventh Circuit upheld the district court’s decision granting summary judgment. Uhlig had failed to satisfy the “objective” prong of the test.  Uhlig claimed that the contract required all electrical work to be performed by licensed journeymen.  However, the contract did not require that licensed electricians perform all electrical work.  At the time Uhlig engaged in protected activity, he had no firsthand knowledge of the contractor’s contractual obligations.  Furthermore, Uhlig’s secondhand knowledge of the contract was not sufficient to support his conclusion.  Thus, Uhlig’s claim that the company violated the contract did not have an objective basis.

This case demonstrates a couple of key points. First, in assessing “protected activity,” courts will evaluate what the purported whistleblower knew at the time of the protected activity.  Thus, information regarding the plaintiff’s actual knowledge can become important.  Second, the case shows courts’ reticence to allow FCA whistleblower claims where the plaintiff’s theory does not at least approximate a legitimate FCA fraud claim.  The substantive doctrines of FCA liability will influence the viability of a protected activity claim.

© 2023 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume VI, Number 292
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Advertisement

Latest Legal News & Analysis

Practical Implications of Travelers v. ICS for Cyber Insurance Brokers, Carriers...
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Trending in Telehealth: January 24, 2023 – February 5, 2023
McDermott Will & Emery
Biometric Claims Subject to Five-Year Statute of Limitations Under Illinois BIPA
Polsinelli PC
Scope 3 To Be Or Not To Be? That Is The ESG Question
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Washed Up: Tension Between Offshore Wind Development and Marine Mammals
Jones Walker LLP
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Hydro Newsletter - Volume 10, Issue 1
By
Van Ness Feldman LLP
To Be, or Not to Be? Considerations for A.I.- Generated Art
By
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Gaming Operators Latest to See Specific Privacy & Cybersecurity Laws
By
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
ICYMI: HIPAA and Social Media IRL
By
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
“Metabirkin” NFT Maker Liable in TM Dispute
By
K&L Gates
Do Lawyers Use CRM?
By
Lawmatics
Advertisement

Upcoming Legal Education Events

PFAS Restriction Proposal Under REACH
Tuesday, February 14, 2023
2023 Labor & Employment Strategic Focus
Tuesday, February 14, 2023
The Evolving Alcohol Industry: A Look Back at 2022 + Predictions for 2023
Thursday, February 16, 2023
Appealing Entertainment: Pennsylvania and West Virginia Appellate Courts Round-Up
Tuesday, February 28, 2023

About this Author

Daniel J Davis, Proskauer Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Daniel J Davis
Special Counsel

Daniel J. Davis is Special Labor & Employment Law Counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department, resident in the Washington, DC office. He represents employers in a range of employment and labor issues, including equal employment, whistleblower and wage payment laws administered by the Department of Labor, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and National Labor Relations Board. He litigates class and collective claims, including claims under Title VII, the ADEA, ERISA, NLRA and the FLSA. He represented The Boeing Company in a high-profile case by the National Labor Relations...

[email protected]
202-416-6815
www.proskauer.com
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
National Law Review
  • Antitrust Law
  • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
  • Biotech, Food, & Drug
  • Business of Law
  • Election & Legislative
  • Construction & Real Estate
  • Environmental & Energy
  • Family, Estates & Trusts
  • Financial, Securities & Banking
  • Global
  • Health Care Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Insurance
  • Labor & Employment
  • Litigation
  • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
  • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
  • Tax
  • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
  • Coronavirus News
  • Law Student Writing Competition
  • Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs

 

As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.

Copyright ©2023 National Law Forum, LLC