October 30, 2020

Volume X, Number 304

Advertisement

October 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Sexual Harassment Training in California Must Now Include the “Prevention of Abusive Conduct”--AB 2053

AB 2053 went into effect on January 1, 2015, thereby requiring that California employers with 50 or more employees provide training on the “prevention of abusive conduct” along with the sexual harassment training already required by law.

“Abusive conduct” is defined under California Government Code section 12950.1(g)(2) as the “conduct of an employer or employee in the workplace, with malice, that a reasonable person would find hostile, offensive, and unrelated to an employer’s legitimate business interests.”  For example, abusive conduct “may include repeated infliction of verbal abuse, such as the use of derogatory remarks, insults, and epithets, verbal or physical conduct that a reasonable person would find threatening, intimidating, or humiliating, or the gratuitous sabotage or undermining of a person’s work performance.” Notably, there is no requirement that the abusive conduct be tied to a protected characteristic nor must it constitute unlawful harassment, discrimination, or retaliation.

Proponents in support of AB 2053 argued that abusive work environments are a “growing epidemic throughout the nation.”  They believe such circumstances lead to low morale, reduced productivity, absenteeism, turnover, and an increase in medical and workers’ compensation claims.  By implementing training and education on abusive conduct, legislators hope to prevent workplace bullying before it starts.  Further, because harassment and abusive conduct frequently occur “hand in hand,” the bill, according to its proponents, simply incorporates abusive conduct prevention into the already mandated sexual harassment training.

At present, there are no requirements setting forth what portion of the sexual harassment training must be dedicated to abusive conduct.  Moreover, the law currently does not create a private right of action for abusive conduct unless such behavior is based on a protected category.  Nevertheless, employers are legally mandated to provide anti-bullying training and should carefully review and revise their sexual harassment curriculum to include materials on the prevention of abusive conduct.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2020National Law Review, Volume V, Number 36
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Carly B. Plaskin, jackson lewis, los angeles, labor, employment, litigation
Associate

Carly B. Plaskin is an Associate in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Her practice focuses on representing employers in workplace law matters, including preventive advice and counsel.

While attending law school, Ms. Plaskin was the Senior Comments Editor for theJournal of International Law. She also interned for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in San Jose and served as an extern at the Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara. Ms. Plaskin was the recipient of the Emery Merit Scholarship and the Herman M....

213-630-8270
Advertisement
Advertisement