September 17, 2019

September 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 16, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Southern District of New York: New York’s Prohibition on Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims Preempted by Federal Law

On July 11, 2018, New York State enacted a sweeping new law aimed at combatting sexual harassment in the employment context.  A year later, on July 22, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that the law’s prohibition from requiring employees to submit sexual harassment claims to mandatory arbitration was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

The court’s decision is a straightforward application of the FAA.  Section 2 of the FAA provides that arbitration agreements are enforceable except on grounds that would invalidate any type of contract.  The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently applied the FAA to invalidate state laws that target the enforceability of arbitration agreements and do not apply generally to all types of contracts.  As New York’s prohibition on mandatory arbitration clauses was clearly targeted at arbitration agreements, it fell squarely within the type of prohibition that is preempted by Section 2 of the FAA.

This decision comes as welcome news to employers, and shows that the FAA remains a powerful tool to ensure that arbitration agreements are enforced even in the face of state legislation.  Employers with questions regarding arbitration agreements would do well to consult with able counsel. 

© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in California

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Associate

Jack Blum is an associate in the firm’s Employment Disputes, Litigation, and Arbitration practice, where he represents employers in connection with a wide range of employment law issues. Jack has extensive experience in defending employers against claims by their employees in federal and state courts, as well as before government agencies like the EEOC, Department of Labor, and state human rights commissions. Jack aggressively defends his client’s personnel practices and decisions while not losing sight of their underlying business goals and objectives. Jack represents clients in all...

202.772.8483