October 30, 2020

Volume X, Number 304

Advertisement

October 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Update - August 8, 2017

In an order issued on June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court denied certiorari without comment in a suit seeking to overturn an Obama administration policy that eliminated the Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction (SSM) exemption. This policy allowed exemptions for emissions in excess of permitted limits during SSM periods. There has been ongoing litigation over the SSM exemption for several years. In 2008, the D.C. Circuit ruled in Sierra Club v. EPA that there can be no blanket exemptions for periods of SSM. Then, in 2014, the D.C. Circuit held in Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA that EPA has no authority to create an affirmative defense for companies that violate permit limits during periods of SSM. As a result of these decisions, the Obama administration began to eliminate all SSM blanket exemptions and affirmative defenses. Currently, EPA is employing case-by-case enforcement discretion to determine whether to bring an enforcement action against a source that violates a permit limit during an SSM period.

This denial leaves another D.C. Circuit case, Florida Electric Power Coordinating Group, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al, as the lead case in the consolidated litigation testing EPA’s SSM policy. This case involves a challenge by a number of industrial groups and states to EPA’s state implementation plan (SIP) call rule. This rule required 36 states to remove SSM exemptions from their state SIPs. The Obama administration argued this rule was necessary to comply with the 2008 and 2014 D.C. Circuit decisions. However, the rule’s challengers argue EPA went too far in extending these holdings to state SIPs. This litigation is currently on hold as President Trump’s EPA is reviewing the state SIP call rule.

© 2020 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 221
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Anna Skinner, Dinsmore Law Firm, Environmental and Litigation Attorney
Associate

Anna Claire is a member of our Litigation Department where she focuses her practice on environmental law. Her experience includes assisting clients on environmental issues in the context of business transactions and compliance counseling. Anna Claire has extensive experience with Clean Air Act enforcement and compliance issues and has helped clients against environmental enforcement initiatives directed at electric utilities. She also has experience in many aspects of discovery and trial preparation, including factual investigation, drafting motions, and witness...

859-425-1065
Advertisement
Advertisement