June 24, 2022

Volume XII, Number 175

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 23, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 22, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

In a Stunning Rebuke to CFPB, OCC Finds Arbitration Rule Will Significantly Increase Cost of Consumer Credit

In a September 20 report, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) seriously undermined the integrity and completeness of the CFPB’s empirical study of consumer arbitration that purports to be the foundation for its final arbitration rule.  In its study, the CFPB concluded that it did not find any statistically significant evidence of increases in the cost of consumer credit associated with banning arbitration clauses in credit card contracts.  However, the OCC, reviewing the same data, found “a strong probability of a significant increase in the cost of credit cards as a result of eliminating mandatory arbitration clauses.”  In particular, it found an 88% chance that the total cost of credit will increase and a 56% chance that costs will increase by 3% or more.  The average increase in the total cost of credit is expected to be 3.43%.  In addition, the OCC stated that additional research would be required “to explore the potential effect on consumer payments, their ability to pay the higher cost and the potential for an increase in delinquencies, or changes in the availability of certain financial products intended to meet the financial needs of consumers.”

The OCC Report is another compelling reason why the Senate should vote to repeal the arbitration rule under the Congressional Review Act.  It shows that the conclusions drawn by the CFPB from its study data cannot be trusted, and its research was incomplete.  The fact that the CFPB  underestimated the economic impact of the arbitration rule on consumers raises questions whether it also underestimated the financial impact of the rule on financial services companies.  The CFPB estimated that the arbitration rule will result in 6,042 additional federal and state court class actions over the next five years that will cost companies between $2.6 billion and $5.3 billion to defend.  As if these figures were not staggering enough, there is now real concern that they are too low!

Copyright © by Ballard Spahr LLPNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 272
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Kaplinksy, partner, New York, finance
Partner

Alan S. Kaplinsky is Co-Practice Leader of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group, which has more than 115 lawyers. Mr. Kaplinsky devotes his practice exclusively to counseling financial institutions on bank regulatory and transactional matters, particularly consumer financial services law, and defending financial institutions that have been sued by consumers in individual and class action lawsuits and by government enforcement agencies. Visit Mr. Kaplinsky's profile in Wikipedia.

...
215-864-8544
Mark Levin, Ballard Spahr Law Firm, Litigation Attorney
Partner

Mark J. Levin is known for his work in complex commercial, insurance, and class-action litigation, with particular experience in consumer finance litigation, the structuring and enforcement of consumer arbitration clauses, and the defense of insurance companies in class actions. He testified in 2007 for the lending industry before a subcommittee of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee at an oversight hearing on whether mandatory arbitration in consumer contracts is fair to consumers.

Mr. Levin has represented banks in defending against the first...

215-864-8235
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement