September 25, 2020

Volume X, Number 269

September 25, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 24, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 23, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Telehealth Update: CMS Proposed CY 2021 Payment Policies, Extension of the Public Health Emergency, Increasing Access after COVID-19, and the Coronavirus Stimulus Package

On August 4, CMS posted a proposed rule on CY 2021 Payment Policies, which included important updates about the expansion of Medicare covered telehealth services due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  This follows on the heels of Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar’s renewal of the federal public health emergency (“PHE”) on July 23.  The PHE, which was initially declared in January, has been extended through October 21, 2020, unless the Secretary declares that the PHE has ended or renews it for additional 90 day periods. 

As previously covered here, a significant number telehealth waivers on the federal and state level are tied to the PHE.  The most significant CMS waivers include: 

  • Allowing the provision of certain Medicare covered services via audio-only technology;

  • Expansion of the types of professionals who may furnish distant site telehealth services; and

  • Expansion of the list of Medicare covered telehealth services and modification of the process to add new services through sub-regulatory guidance.

As discussed in the proposed rule, CMS has reviewed the telehealth services that were added for the duration of the PHE and determined that a number of services should be added to the Medicare physician fee schedule on a permanent basis.   The full list of proposed additions to the Medicare Telehealth Services List is available here.  The rule also proposes expanding certain of the telehealth waivers through the end of the calendar year in which the PHE ends.  Finally, CMS’s proposal includes provisions to allow CMS to gather information about the utilization of telehealth services during the PHE, with the goal of making permanent changes to telehealth requirements.

OCR’s enforcement discretion around HIPAA requirements, which allows telehealth provides to use non-HIPAA compliant technology, is also tied to the PHE.  The relaxation of HIPAA requirements has removed the barrier to providing telehealth services for many providers, although all providers should take steps to ensure that all state requirements related to the delivery of telehealth services are met, and that protected health information remains secured. 

Although some state telehealth waivers and emergency regulations are also tied to the PHE, many are based on the individual states’ emergency declarations.  As previously discussed, we have also seen some recent movement towards making the changes in telehealth requirements permanent.  For example, New York recently amended its telehealth statute, N.Y. Pub Health Law § 2999-CC, to specifically allow for coverage of audio-only telehealth services under the states’ Medicaid program.  Changes like this are essential in improving access to telehealth services during the pandemic and beyond. 

While the Senate and the House are still negotiating the next coronavirus stimulus package, both chambers have proposed provisions aimed at increasing access to telehealth services.  The HEROES act, which was passed by the House in May, includes direct funding and other provisions aimed at increasing telehealth access and infrastructure.  The Senate’s proposed plan, which was outlined by Senate Republican leadership last week, would extend the CMS telehealth waivers through December 31, 2021 or through the end of the PHE, whichever is later.  The Senate bill also expands access to telehealth by allowing employers to offer telehealth benefits to employees who are not working full time or otherwise do not qualify for employer coverage.  

©1994-2020 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 218

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Cassandra L. Paolillo, Health care lawyer, Mintz Levin Law Firm
Associate

Cassie’s practice primarily involves advising health care clients on transactional and regulatory matters, including mergers and acquisitions, regulatory compliance, and general contracting.

Throughout her career, Cassie has worked with providers, payors, and individual patients, so she understands the unique challenges facing clients in the ever-changing health care landscape.

Prior to joining Mintz, Cassie worked as in-house counsel at a national senior living company. There she advised the business on matters related to state and federal health care regulations, physician...

617-348-1828
Ellen L. Janos, Health care attorney, mintz levin law firm,Digital Health PBMs & Pharmacies Hospitals & Health Systems Post-Acute & Long-Term Care Retail & Urgent Care Physician Organizations
Member

Ellen utilizes her in-depth knowledge of health care regulation to assist clients with government audits and investigations, M&A and financing transactions, and corporate compliance activities. She also provides strategic advice to traditional health care providers, investors, and start-ups on telehealth initiatives as well as the traditional practice of medicine across multiple states. Ellen often comments on developments in telehealth, HIPAA, and the corporate practice of medicine. As an assistant attorney general for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Ellen represented state agencies responsible for health care reimbursement, licensing, and Medicaid fraud prosecutions. She has successfully argued two cases before the US Supreme Court.

Ellen specializes in providing regulatory and strategic advice to health care providers and payors of all types, including hospitals, managed care organizations, long-term care facilities, pharmacies, pharmaceutical and device manufacturers, telemedicine providers, and urgent care and retail health clinics. She also represents companies doing business with, and investing in, health care providers. One of Ellen’s provider clients was quoted saying, “I can bring her any issue or question and she is able to quickly provide insights and answers that are practical and business-oriented. She is a true health care expert.”

Ellen's practice focuses on Medicare, Medicaid, and third-party payor audits and investigations, the development of corporate compliance programs, and hospital/physician relationships, including compliance with the state and federal anti-kickback laws and the Stark Law. In addition, she advises clients on how to deploy telemedicine and internet based health initiatives, electronic health records, and how to address HIPAA privacy and security matters.

Before joining Mintz, Ellen was an assistant attorney general for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, representing state agencies responsible for health care reimbursement, licensing, and Medicaid fraud prosecutions.

Ellen served as a member of the advisory committee that worked with the Massachusetts Health IT Council on the development and implementation of the statewide HIT strategic plan and health information exchange.

She has written about and speaks frequently on state and federal telehealth laws, the corporate practice of medicine, compliance programs, board governance matters, HIPAA privacy and data security, technology and health care, and hospital/physician relationships. Ellen has successfully argued two cases before the US Supreme Court.

617-348-1662