Skip to main content

June 1, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 152

National Law Review
  • Login
  • Mdn
  • FB
  • twt
  • link
  • home
  • rss
Advertisement
  • logo
  • Publish / Advertise with Us
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Join Our Team
    • Search
  • Trending Legal News
    • Most Recent
    • Legal News Podcast
    • What's Trending
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • NLR Blog
    • Search
  • About Us
    • About the NLR
    • NLR Team
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • NLR Thought Leadership Awards
      • 2018
      • 2019
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Search
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Search
  • Quick Links
    • Legal News Podcast
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Search
  • ENEWSBULLETINS

43

New Articles
Bottom Row Image
Advertisement

June 01, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • The CROWN Act: Unbraiding the Legal Issues for Employers by: Rainét N. Spence
  • Beware of the SLAT Divorce Trap by: Andrew M. Logan
  • NLRB General Counsel Asserts Non-Competes Violate the National Labor... by: Clifford R. Atlas and Jonathan J. Spitz
  • EPA Issues Final Rule to Accelerate Use of Plant-Incorporated... by: Lisa R. Burchi and James V. Aidala
  • Cross-Border Data Transfers Under China’s Personal Information... by: Ziyan "Frank" Xue
  • Singapore’s Central Bank and Google Cloud Collaborate on Responsible... by: Charmian Aw
  • Marketing Implications of California’s Proposition 12 by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • IRS Issues Notice Regarding Expansion of EPCRS under SECURE 2.0 Act by: Katina K. Gorman and Brian T. Gallagher
  • Minnesota PFAS Ban the Broadest in the Nation by: John Gardella
  • Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2023: All Things ADA, LOA, FMLA, and... by: Stacy M. Bunck and John G. Stretton
  • Health Care Fraud and Labor Unrest Top Today’s Docket – SCOTUS Today by: Stuart M. Gerson
  • Fair Work Act Changes - Important Changes Approaching by: Alanna Fitzpatrick and Michaela Moloney
  • IRS Provides Additional Guidance for Advanced Energy Projects Under... by: John Eliason and Kenneth M. Minesinger
  • Reversal Rates In The Sixth Circuit And Elsewhere by: Colter Paulson
  • Increase in Nonimmigrant Visas Fees at Consulates Delayed to June 17... by: Forrest G. Read IV
  • Debt Ceiling Showdown Yields Significant Permitting Reform Legislation by: Eric L. Christensen and Julius M. Redd
  • Illinois Poised To Become Latest State To Mandate Pay Transparency by: David G. Weldon and Charity N. Seaborn
  • NLRB General Counsel Targets Non-Compete Agreements as Unlawful by: Maureen Rouse-Ayoub and Ashleigh E. Draft
  • BETO Announces Novel State-of-the-Art Workflow Technology to... by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • BETO Launches New Renewable Carbon Resources Web Page by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • IRS Issues Proposed Regulations for Energy Projects Located in Low-... by: John Eliason and Margaret J. Weil
  • Court Holds State Owned LLCs Are Not "Political Subdivisions... by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • Supreme Court Ends Protection for Most Wetlands In The U.S.—But Not... by: Jon Welner
  • ANSES Calls for the EC to Adopt a “More Protective” Definition of... by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • Minnesota Worker Safety Legislation for Meatpacking and Warehouse... by: Brent D. Kettelkamp and Nathan T. Boone
  • NLRB General Counsel Says Noncompete Agreements Violate Federal Labor... by: Jennifer Betts and Tobias E. Schlueter
  • This Week in 340B: May 23 – 30, 202 by: Emily J. Cook and Ming Chuang
  • New Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions on Certain Paper... by: Nancy A. Noonan and Leah Scarpelli
  • Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Waters Protected by the Clean Water... by: James Rusk and S. Keith Garner
  • Court Affirmed a Judgment That a Will Was Invalid Due to Mental... by: David Fowler Johnson
  • At least two Supreme Court Justices think there's a limit to... by: Jeffrey R. Porter

May 31, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • Part II: With New DAO Law on the Books, Utah Joins Race with Wyoming... by: Jason H. Finger and Peter Cramer
  • EEOC Issues Nonbinding Guidance on Permissible Employer Use of... by: Rosemary Alito and Erinn L. Rigney
  • AAFCO Comments on the Pet Food Institute’s Proposed New Federalized... by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • NLRB Memorandum GC23-08: "Non-Compete Agreements that Violate... by: Craig T. Papka and Michael R. Scherer
  • China: MOU of ETF Products Between China and Singapore Exchanges by: Chloe Duan and Grace Ye
  • “Forever chemicals:” a PFAS regulatory update with Jean Mosites [... by: Jean M. Mosites
  • Mintz May Madness: Montana’s New Consumer Data Privacy Law Follows... by: Michael B. Katz and Cynthia J. Larose
  • Sackett Decision Shrinks Federal Regulation of Wetlands by: Lisa M. Bruderly
  • Time Is Money: A Quick Wage-Hour Tip on … Training Time by: Ann Knuckles Mahoney
  • FCA Publishes Findings From its Whistleblowing Survey 2022 by: Ciara McBrien and Neil Robson
  • Interpretation of an Interpreter Request? 11th Circuit Weighs in on... by: Amy Puckett and Anne R. Yuengert
  • NLRB General Counsel Takes Aim at Non-Competition Agreements by: Sara J. Robertson and Isaac T. Caverly
  • U.S. Executive Branch Update – May 31, 2023 by: Stacy A. Swanson
  • Montana Passes 9th Comprehensive Consumer Privacy Law in the U.S. by: Jason C. Gavejian and Joseph J. Lazzarotti
  • NLRB General Counsel Now Targeting Noncompetes for Nonmanagerial and... by: Steven M. Swirsky and Erin E. Schaefer
  • Michigan Court of Appeals Broadens Potential Exposure to Securities... by: Matthew P. Allen
  • NLRB General Counsel Issues Memo Targeting Noncompete Agreements for... by: Steven M. Swirsky and Erin E. Schaefer
  • Ninth Circuit Declines To Aggregate Loans For Usury Exemption by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • NY Attorney General Proposes to Increase Obligations on Crypto... by: Gary De Waal and Daniel J. Davis
  • European Commission Responds to ESA's Questions on The... by: Áine Ní Riain and Gayle Bowen
  • South Korea Looks to Tighten Biometrics Laws Amid Generative AI by: Charmian Aw
  • SCOTUS Warhol Decision Articulates Narrow Limitation to... by: Kevin P. Ray
  • Retailers: What Anticounterfeiting and Antipiracy Strategies Work for... by: Matthew Nigriny and Gary A. Abelev
  • Lower Colorado Basin States’ Compromise on Water Conservation by: Christopher Thorne and Casey A. Shpall
  • Securities Litigation Alert: Ninth Circuit Clarifies Standards... by: Jason M. Halper and Ellen Holloman
  • Minnesota Extends Protections and Accommodations for Pregnant and... by: Cynthia A. Bremer and Jody Ward-Rannow
  • Bored Ape Yacht Club NFT Drama Isn’t Boring At All by: Jessica G. Kraver
  • Do you really intend to offer NFTs, digital collectibles, and virtual... by: Michael R. Justus
  • Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2023: Multistate Monday—Updating... by: Dee Anna Hays and Christine Bestor Townsend
  • Majority of States Have Legalized Marijuana, but OSHA’s Post-Incident... by: Wayne E. Pinkstone and John Surma
  • California High Court Defines Protected “Disclosure” Under... by: Cole K. Waldhauser
  • SEC Adopts Final Rule Amendments to Form PF by: Adam Bolter
  • Gas Pipeline Methane Emissions Under Congressional Scrutiny; PHMSA... by: Kurt L. Krieger and Kevin W. Hivick Jr.
  • Federal Court to Reexamine Merits of a Nationwide Injunction to Tip... by: Allison B Williams and Ashley Faulkner
  • No Limits: Non-Compete Agreements Next Up on NLRB General Counsel... by: Michael J. Lebowich and Mark Theodore
  • European Parliament’s Leading Committees Vote to Approve AI Act by: Simon J. McMenemy

May 30, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • What to Expect When You’re Expecting: An Overview of the Proposed... by: Jonathan D. Wohlwend
  • Summer State/Local Law Round-Up, Part 1 of 2 (US) by: Shennan Harris and Ariel S. Cohen
  • The Comprehensive US Privacy Law Deluge: Which US Privacy Laws Apply... by: Liisa M. Thomas
  • Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Both the Florida Legislature... by: Joshua Briones and Esteban Morales
  • Boring Down on Unexceptional Arguments for Exceptionality by: Stephanie D. Scruggs
  • ESI Protocols: Courts Hold Parties to Account for Failing to Comply... by: Electronic Discovery at KL Gates
  • Will California Provide a De Facto Local Tax Exemption for the Sale... by: James T. Smith and Nikki E. Dobay
  • The Government Isn't Moving Quickly to Compensate Camp Lejeune... by: Lynwood P. Evans and Taylor B. Rodney
  • Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Enforcement Bureau Takes First... by: Russell H. Fox and Jonathan P. Garvin
  • THE ANTI-ROBOCALL LITIGATION TASK FORCE LAUNCHES ITS FIRST ATTACK:... by: Angelika Munger
  • Illinois Court Requires Express Delineation of Any Non-Employment... by: Peter A. Steinmeyer and Ridhi D. Madia
  • The Evolving Landscape of Enterprise SaaS by: Louis Lehot and Alicia D'Alba Dorner
  • Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Commission Expands Its... by: Russell H. Fox and Jonathan P. Garvin
  • NJ Workers Involved in Labor Disputes Now Qualify for Increased... by: Laura H. Schuman and Neresa A. De Biasi
  • (Australia) Post Administration R&D Tax Offsets Deemed Personal... by: Masi Zaki and Kate Spratt
  • NLRB Just Issued An Updated ALJ Bench Book – Why You Should Read It by: David J. Pryzbylski
  • Florida Legislature Reduces State-Level Sales Tax on Most Real... by: Marvin A. Kirsner
  • Healthcare Preview for The Week Of: May 30, 2023 by: McDermott + Consulting
  • Sports Betting and the NCAA: What You Need to Know by: Ally Rich
  • Canada Passes Legislation to Ban Imports Produced by Forced Labor –... by: Birgit Matthiesen
  • GT Immigration Policy Briefing | May 26, 2023 by: Laura Foote Reiff and Rebecca B. Schechter
  • U.S. Executive Branch Update – May 30, 2023 by: Stacy A. Swanson
  • FTC’s New Policy Statement on Biometric Information Provides Clear... by: Kyle R. Fath and Kristin L. Bryan
  • The NLRB is Reviewing Union Access to Employer Email and Electronic... by: Alan J. Marcuis and Stephen P. Kopstein
  • How Aggressive Should You Be With a Disloyal Business Partner? by: David C. Roberts
  • Mortgage Bankers Association Files Amici Brief in CFPB... by: Christina Grigorian
  • Wetlands Redefined: Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Clean Water Act in... by: Adam R. Troutwine and Jacob M. Levin
  • Remote I-9 Verification Ending Soon by: Laurie M. Riley and Mary Ellen Jordan
  • Weekly Bankruptcy Alert May 30, 2023 (For the week ending May 28,... by: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
  • Manner of Computation of Net Winnings Prescribed for Online Gaming... by: Tanisha Khanna and Ipsita Agarwalla
  • FDA Studies Foreshadow Potential Changes to Direct-to-Consumer... by: Christopher Hanson
  • FERC Approves Enforcement's Settlements with Two Demand Response... by: Kimberly Frank and Ruta K. Skucas
  • FTC Asserts COPPA Does Not Preempt State Laws by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • The IRS Starts the Summer with a Splash: New Guidance for Self-... by: Tenechia D. Lockhart
  • Rise in VCM Business May Trigger CFTC Oversight on Sales of Carbon... by: Karen Ellis Carr and Paul E. Greenwalt III
  • Form I-9: Sunsetting of COVID-19 Temporary Flexibilities and the Use... by: Linnea C. Porter
  • Chicago Updates Its “Ban the Box” Rule to Limit an Employer’s... by: Ryan Probasco
  • Study Assesses Cost of Climate Litigation on Shareholder Value by: Sara Bussiere and Zack Schrieber
  • IAASB Public Consultation on Proposed Sustainability Assurance... by: Sukhvir Basran and Simon Walsh
  • Supreme Court Tosses NY Corruption Convictions, Signaling Skepticism... by: Tara S. Sarosiek and Virginia C. Wright
  • EPA Proposes Updates to TSCA New Chemicals Regulations; Comments Due... by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • European Council Adopts Position on Amendments to EU’s Green... by: Rachel Rodman and Duncan Grieve
  • Trending in Telehealth: May 16 – 22, 2023 by: Stacey L. Callaghan and Taylor Edward Hood
  • Treasury Department and IRS Release Guidance on the New Domestic... by: Don J. Lonczak and Steven J. Lorch
  • President Biden Signs New Environmental Justice Executive Order by: Timbre Shriver and Chad Lee

May 29, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • California Supreme Court Extends Whistleblower Protections Again by: Omar F. Hassan
  • China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases 8-... by: Aaron Wininger
  • Department of Labor Issues Guidance on New PUMP Act by: Donald L. Samuels and Emily E. Tichenor
  • Minnesota Establishes State-Sponsored ‘Secure Choice’ Retirement... by: Nathan T. Boone
  • Are Loans Securities? A Kirschner Case Update by: Leah Edelboim
  • Australia: Proposed Reforms To The Anti-Money Laundering And Counter-... by: Daniel Knight

Article By

Rebecca Porter

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Commercial Litigation Update - EBG
Epstein Becker and Green, P.C. Law Firm

Related Practices & Jurisdictions


  • Constitutional Law
  • Communications, Media & Internet
  • Litigation / Trial Practice
  • All Federal
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Tweet
Advertisement

Time to Reboot the Internet? The Supreme Court Hears Challenges to Big Tech Platforms

Wednesday, March 29, 2023


While some people thrive in the land of TikTok dances, others struggle to limit their thoughts to 140 characters leading Twitter to increase their character limit to 280 in 2017. In fact, as of February 2019 Internet users believe social media platforms have increased access to information and the ease of communication by 57 percent.

Surely, there is no shortage of online content.

The proliferation of new applications and technology also has meant the dissemination of diverse information. To date, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 has largely sheltered platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, that house users’ messages, from legal liability. Section 230 provides “interactive computer services” cannot be deemed the publisher of and held liable for third-party content. But a case currently pending before the United States Supreme Court, Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google, may change that.

In 2015, Nohemi Gonzalez, an American college student studying in France, was killed by the international terrorist group, ISIS. The day after the attack ISIS released a written statement in a YouTube video claiming responsibility.

Eight years later, her family found themselves at the Supreme Court as the nine Justices wrestled with a lawsuit that challenged the intersection of technology companies and the policies formed generations ago that govern them.

The Gonzalez family alleged YouTube—owned by Google—is legally responsible for the Paris attacks through its algorithm, which provides user-feed recommendations in the form of video thumbnails. YouTube’s algorithm “recommended that users view inflammatory videos created by ISIS, videos which played a key role in recruiting fighters to join ISIS in its subjugation of a large area of the Middle East, and to commit terrorist acts in their home countries.” Gonzalez’s counsel argued the site should be held responsible for the content of those videos as it acted as a recruiting platform for the terrorist group.

In contrast, Google argued terrorist content is banned on the platform and that it regularly enforced policies preventing terrorist from using its services. Counsel for Google also argued Section 230 generally immunizes technology and social media companies from liability stemming from what their users share on their platforms. Google contended such immunity is essential to tech companies’ ability to provide useful content to its users and customize user experience.

Does Section 230 provide a legal distinction between a company hosting user content, and amplifying user content through the algorithmic recommendations their websites may provide? That question is open to debate.

Four principles serve as justification for protecting speech: to further self-governance; to aid in the discovery of truth and maintain the marketplace of ideas; to promote autonomy and protect self-expression; and to encourage tolerance. These principles have real-world effects.

What is viewed as a strong pillar of the First Amendment, is the “marketplace of ideas.” Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes endorsed the idea that “the ultimate good desire is better reached by free trade of ideas” where the government cannot censor false or harmful speech because its judgment might be wrong, but allows citizens to weigh the ideas in a competitive market.

Justice Holmes’ vision appears to be based on a simple rationale: good ideas win and the better argument will be persuasive. Even if the First Amendment is viewed as an important symbol of our country, it is a highly labile one. Many criticize the effectiveness of using the marketplace of ideas because it often ignores that in order for the marketplace to work, citizens need interactions that develop a sense of trust and build on habits of cooperation.

Indeed, Oxford Dictionary selected “post-truth” as the 2016 word of the year defined as “denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotional belief.” A study that analyzed over 376 million Facebook users’ interactions, found that people tend to only seek information that aligns with their views. Perhaps what YouTube’s algorithm currently provides.

For over two hours the Court grappled with the idea of potentially exposing companies to a barrage of lawsuits related to their handling of user content. “We really don’t know about these things. You know, these are not like the nine greatest experts on the internet,” Justice Elena Kagan said of herself and her colleagues, several smiling in agreement. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, similarly noted: “Congress, not the Court, should make needed changes to a law passed early in the internet age” and questioned, “isn’t it better to put the burden on Congress to change that?”

We must appreciate Justice Holmes’ wisdom, but also acknowledge what is often not included is the perspective: the cultural, intellect, and political combat that is derived from free speech. The marketplace of ideas can be unpredictable and even impossible to be domesticated in certain situations. Gonzalez v. Google highlights how these situations bring important questions to the fore, including: Does the First Amendment continue to preserve the wholesale protection of speech, or is there is a point at which we are willing to limit avenues of speech, and interject with justifications for regulation?

Perhaps the regulation starts with Section 230 itself. However, the Court appeared cautious about how to sensibly narrow the protections afforded by Section 230. Among the Court’s concerns was how to limit sweeping consequences for internet users, and the onslaught of litigation that would surely result. “You are creating a world of lawsuits,” Justice Kagan stated. “Really, anytime you have content, you also have these presentational and prioritization choices that can be subject to suit.”

The Supreme Court is expected to release a decision on the case by end of June.


©2023 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 88
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Advertisement

Latest Legal News & Analysis

The CROWN Act: Unbraiding the Legal Issues for Employers
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Beware of the SLAT Divorce Trap
Blank Rome LLP
NLRB General Counsel Asserts Non-Competes Violate the National Labor Relations Act
Jackson Lewis P.C.
EPA Issues Final Rule to Accelerate Use of Plant-Incorporated Biotechnologies
Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
Cross-Border Data Transfers Under China’s Personal Information Protection Law
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

IRS Provides Additional Guidance for Advanced Energy Projects Under Section 48C of...
By
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Reversal Rates In The Sixth Circuit And Elsewhere
By
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Increase in Nonimmigrant Visas Fees at Consulates Delayed to June 17, 2023
By
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Debt Ceiling Showdown Yields Significant Permitting Reform Legislation
By
Beveridge & Diamond PC
Illinois Poised To Become Latest State To Mandate Pay Transparency
By
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
NLRB General Counsel Targets Non-Compete Agreements as Unlawful
By
Varnum LLP

Upcoming Legal Education Events

PE & Healthcare Summit Berlin 2023
Tuesday, June 6, 2023
FinTech University: FinTech and International Law
Tuesday, June 6, 2023
Ward and Smith's 2023 Health Care Breakfast and Learns at New Bern Golf & Country Club!
Wednesday, June 7, 2023
PCI DSS 4.0: Third-party Service Providers And Risk Management
Wednesday, June 7, 2023
Advertisement

About this Author

Rebecca Porter Princeton Commercial Litigator Epstein Becker Green
Rebecca Porter
Associate

Litigation attorney Rebecca Porter is an Associate at Epstein Becker Green's Princeton office. Rebecca works closely with national and regional clients to design and carry out the litigation strategies that meet their unique business concerns.

Rebecca represents health care, life sciences, and commercial organizations in federal and state court litigation and arbitrations. Her work involves antitrust matters, contract disputes, and business torts.

Before joining Epstein Becker Green, Rebecca served as a Judicial Law...

[email protected]
609-250-6029
www.ebglaw.com
National Law Review
  • Antitrust Law
  • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
  • Biotech, Food, & Drug
  • Business of Law
  • Election & Legislative
  • Construction & Real Estate
  • Environmental & Energy
  • Family, Estates & Trusts
  • Financial, Securities & Banking
  • Global
  • Health Care Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Insurance
  • Labor & Employment
  • Litigation
  • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
  • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
  • Tax
  • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
  • Coronavirus News
  • Law Student Writing Competition
  • Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs

 

As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.

Copyright ©2023 National Law Forum, LLC