February 4, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 35

Error message

  • Warning: Undefined variable $settings in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).

February 03, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 02, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

The United States Seeks Consultations with the Mexican Government Regarding Mexico Energy Policy under the USMCA

The United States of America has requested dispute settlement consultations with the Mexican Government under Chapter 31 of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA). The consultations are linked to Mexico’s new energy policy implemented by the Mexican President Mr. López Obrador (“AMLO”), specifically regarding legislative and administrative measures adopted in the energy industry during AMLO's administration. As previously informed, the Mexican government has implemented measures to strengthen Mexico’s state-owned companies mainly in the power and natural gas sector. The main beneficiaries of this new policy include the utility company, Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE), and the national oil and gas company Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex).

Since October 2020, the U.S. Government and Congress have repeatedly expressed concerns regarding the changes in the energy policy implemented by AMLO’s administration and the negative impacts on US investors, which violate the provisions of the USMCA. John Kerry, the United States special presidential envoy for climate, has visited Mexico three times in the last eight months to discuss the new energy policy and energy transition in Mexico with the Mexican President. However, no changes have been implemented, despite Kerry’s endeavors and efforts from numerous congressional representatives expressing their concerns to the current and former U.S. presidents.

The request for consultations covers four main topics reasoning that Mexico’s new energy policy and measures are inconsistent with the USMCA, specifically provisions regarding Market Access, Investment, State-Owned Enterprises, Publication, and Administration.

1.  Amendments to the Electricity Industry Law

In 2019 the Mexican Congress passed certain amendments to the Electricity Industry Law (“EIL”). One of the main changes to the EIL consisted in the change of the dispatch rules for the National Electric System. According to the amendments to the EIL, Mexico’s independent system operator (CENACE) is now forced to prioritize electricity coming from power stations owned by CFE over electricity generated from power stations owned by the private investors, regardless if they are more clean and cost efficient. These measures prevent the private investors access to the power market and favors CFE over other players in the power market. 

2.  Regulatory Impasse

The U.S. Government also considers that the private companies are hindered to operate in the energy sector in Mexico by delaying, denying or revoking power generation permits or any modification thereof. These measures have prevented private investors to (i) operate renewable power generation facilities; (ii) import and export fuel; (iii) operate fuel storage facilities or (iv) build and operate retail fuel stations.

3.  Delay in the Requirement to Supply Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel only for Pemex

In 2019, the Energy Regulatory Commission (“ERC”) granted, only and exclusively to Pemex, a five year extension to the obligation on maximum sulfur content requirement for automotive diesel standard.

4.  Natural Gas Transportation Policy

On June 13, 2022 the Ministry of Energy (ME) sent to the ERC and the Independent Natural Gas System Operator (CENAGAS) an official communication exhorting the ERC to modify the independent system operator’s general terms and conditions applicable to the national integrated pipeline system (SISTRANGAS) in order to force the SISTRANGAS’ users to buy natural gas from CFE or PEMEX in the natural gas market.

5.  State vs State Dispute Mechanism under the USMCA

Pursuant to Chapter 31 of the USMCA, the parties shall enter into consultation procedure 30 days after the delivery of the request. The consultation procedure shall be confidential. If the Parties fail to resolve the dispute within 75 days after the request of consultation, the U.S. Government may request the establishment of a panel. The panel shall present the final report on the dispute approximately 200 days as of the request was made.

Dispute Settlement

If the U.S. Government prevails in the dispute, the Mexican Government will be forced to derogate the amendments passed by the Congress to the Electricity Industry Law, forcing the ERC to respect the current Energy Reform. Otherwise, the U.S. Government may suspend the application to Mexico of benefits of equivalent effect to the non-conformity or the nullification or impairment until the Parties agree on a resolution to the dispute.

6.  Investment Arbitration for Private Investors

Regardless of the Consultation procedure initiated by the U.S. Government, this is a State vs. State dispute. The Consultation procedure will neither hinder nor prevent the private investors to initiate investment arbitration against the Mexican government as a result of AMLO’s new energy policy. As you may recall, private investors holding power generation permits, retail fuel station permits, and/or fuel import/export permits are protected by the USMCA/NAFTA or the CPTPP and thus, are entitled to file for investment arbitration against the Mexican government.

© 2023 Foley & Lardner LLPNational Law Review, Volume XII, Number 207

About this Author

Roberto Arena Reyes Retana, Foley Lardner Law Firm, Mexico, Insurance and Energy Law Attorney

Roberto Arena is a trusted advisor for businesses in the energy, insurance, electricity, financial, and oil and gas sectors, including many public companies with an interest in international tax planning and inbound and outbound international business transactions. He often handles sophisticated interpretation of treaties to avoid double taxation, large-scale mergers and acquisitions, real estate litigation, corporate organizations and reorganizations, and multi-jurisdictional litigation-related matters.

Roberto is the founding partner of the...

Daniel Aranda Corporate & Trial Attorney Foley & Lardner Mexico City

Daniel Aranda is a bilingual, bicultural corporate and trial lawyer serving clients in the U.S., Mexican and international energy law, pipeline, banking and finance sectors. Daniel is also a member of Foley's Energy Industry, and Government Procurement Practice in Mexico City.

Daniel represents foreign and domestic clients with all aspects of their international energy law needs, including:

  • Representation before the Mexican energy authorities (CRE, CNH, Ministry of Energy, Pemex and CFE)
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Project development and...
David Berezowsky Finance Practice Mexico City Lawyers Foley & Lardner
Of Counsel

David Berezowsky is a business lawyer and an of counsel with Foley & Lardner LLP. David is based in the firm’s Mexico City office where he is a member of the firm’s Finance Practice. His areas of practice cover a broad range of business and financial matters including, renewable energy, project finance, infrastructure projects, government procurement projects, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, life sciences, and administrative litigation.

David’s experience in renewable energy and project finance includes representing developers and investors in the construction,...