March 3, 2021

Volume XI, Number 62

Advertisement

March 03, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 02, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 01, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

UPDATE: SCOTUS (U.S. Supreme Court) Denies Petition For Cert In Iskanian

On June 24, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued a controversial decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC.  While the Court in Iskanian confirmed that an express class action waiver in an employment arbitration agreement is enforceable under California law, it also held that an arbitration agreement provision barring arbitration of a workers’ representative Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim is invalid as a matter of California public policy.  Under PAGA, employees can sue their employer for certain workplace violations on behalf of themselves, as well as other current or former employees, in “representative suits” similar to class actions.

The Iskanian Court reasoned that PAGA claims are outside the scope of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) because PAGA claims address disputes between the state and the employer, not between two contracting private parties.  The impact of this decision is that employers would no longer be able to compel employees to arbitrate PAGA claims.  Thus, following Iskanian, employers across California hoped that this decision excluding PAGA from the FAA would be taken up and reviewed by the United States Supreme Court.  A more detailed review of the decision may be found here: California Supreme Court Issues Iskanian Decision.

On September 22, 2014, CLS Transportation filed its petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, presenting the following question:

“Is an employee’s waiver in an arbitration agreement of a collective or “representative action” under the California Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. Labor Code § 2698 et seq., so distinguishable from a “class action” waiver that it is immune from the otherwise preemptive effect of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S. Code § 1, et seq., as held by this Court in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011)?”

On January 20, 2015, the Court denied CLS Transportation’s petition.  As a result, Iskanian remains good law in California state courts.

On the other hand, federal courts are not bound by Iskanian and several federal district courts have refused to apply Iskanian, instead requiring employees to arbitrate their PAGA claims on an individual basis.  Given this current split in authority, and because employers remain vulnerable to costly class and representative actions, it is imperative that California employers retain legal counsel to ensure that their arbitration agreements are developed with these issues in mind. 

Advertisement
Copyright © 2020, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume V, Number 33
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Frances Hernandez, LItigation Attorney, Sheppard Mullin, federal labor
Associate

 Ms. Hernandez is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm's Orange County office.

Areas of Practice

Ms. Hernandez specializes in state and federal labor and employment law representing employers. 

714.424.8227
Marlene M. Nicolas, Labor Law Legal Specialist, Sheppard Mullin
Associate

Marlene Nicolas is a partner in the Labor and Employment Group in the firm's Los Angeles Office.

"I take great care to understand my clients, their business objectives, as well as their motivations, and then I develop a compliance or litigation strategy that facilitates their interests, while working to minimize employment risk or liability."

Marlene's Approach

Marlene is a true advocate for her clients, demonstrating a unique ability to connect and inspire complete confidence in her counsel. From a family of small-business...

213-617-4191
Lisa Harris, labor, employment, Lawyer, Sheppard Mullin, labor matters
Associate

Lisa Harris is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm's Century City and New York offices.

Areas of Practice

Ms. Harris counsels and represents management in both employment and traditional labor matters.

Employment Counseling. Ms. Harris regularly counsels management in all aspects of California, New York and federal employment law, including employee hiring and discipline procedures, restrictive covenants, worker classification issues, leaves of absence, wage and hour compliance, and employee severance and...

310-228-2266
Advertisement
Advertisement