October 19, 2019

October 18, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Updates for Tax-Exempt Organizations from the Senate Bill

Early on December 2, 2017, the Senate passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Senate Bill”).  This blog entry describes certain provisions of the Senate Bill that would have the most significant impact on the nonprofit community, including important differences between the Senate Bill and the prior version of the Senate bill and the bill passed by the House of Representatives (the “House Bill”) (both of which we described several weeks ago in “Updates for Tax-Exempt Organizations from the Senate Markup to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”).

Unless otherwise noted, all proposals described below would be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.

Excise tax on net investment income of private colleges and universities

The Senate Bill includes the imposition of a 1.4% excise tax on the annual net investment income of private institutions of higher education that have assets with an aggregate fair market value of at least $500,000 per student (other than those assets which are used directly in carrying out the institution’s exempt purpose) and at least 500 tuition-paying students, and on related tax-exempt organizations.  The prior version of the Senate bill and the House version of the bill included a $250,000 per student threshold  The House Bill includes in these calculations the investment income and assets of related organizations, while the Senate Bill does not include investment income and assets of related organizations to the extent that (a) the related organization is not controlled by, or a supporting organization to, the educational institution and (b) they are not intended or available for the use of the educational institution.  This provision would effectively parallel the existing excise tax on the net investment income of private foundations, which the House Bill has proposed to streamline to 1.4%.

Expansion of excise tax on tax-exempt organizations and certain highly-compensated employees

The Senate Bill as well as the House Bill would impose a 20% excise tax on compensation of more than $1 million paid by any tax-exempt organization to any of its top-five highest compensated employees (including all wages and many benefits but not contributions to certain tax-advantaged retirement plans).  This new rule effectively parallels the existing $1 million deductibility limitation for executive compensation paid by publicly traded companies.  This will potentially impact executives and other highly compensated employees of large tax-exempt entities.  Notably, athletic coaches at educational institutions, as well as commissioners and other senior executives of other tax-exempt sports entities would potentially be included among the affected employees.

The 20% excise tax to be paid by the organization would also apply to certain severance “parachute payments” that are paid to covered employees in excess of the employee’s “base amount” of compensation.  The methodology for calculating this excise tax is similar to the methodology for determining the excise tax on excess parachute payments paid to certain employees upon a corporation’s change of control under Code sections 280G and 4999.

However, the Senate Bill does not include the provision in the prior version that would have explicitly classified investment advisors and athletic coaches at most institutions of higher education as disqualified persons who are personally subject to substantial penalties on excess benefit payments.  The Senate Bill also does not include the provision contained in the prior version that would have repealed the “rebuttable presumption” that compensation is reasonable if the organization follows certain procedures.  The House Bill also would not alter the rebuttable presumption.

No inclusion of name and logo licensing income for tax-exempts in taxable UBTI

The Senate Bill does not contain the provision in the prior version that would have classified royalty income derived from the licensing of a tax-exempt organization’s name or logo as unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”).  Thus, under the Senate Bill, there would be no change to current law.  The House Bill similarly does not include a proposal on this point.

UBTI separately computed for each trade or business

The Senate Bill includes a provision requiring the computation of UBTI for each separate unrelated trade or business, which (depending on the particular facts) could limit the use of losses from an unrelated trade or business losses to offset income from a separate profitable unrelated trade or business.

 Tax-exempt status for professional sports leagues remains intact

Under the Senate Bill (and the House Bill), professional sports leagues remain eligible for tax-exempt status.  

Changes to tax-exempt bond rules

Like the House Bill, the Senate Bill provides for the repeal of the tax-exemption for advance refunding bonds.  Unlike the House Bill, the Senate Bill leaves unaffected the tax exemption of interest on qualified private activity bonds.  The Senate Bill also does not include the provision contained in the House Bill prohibiting the use of governmental tax-exempt bonds, issued to finance the construction of, or capital expenditures for, a professional sports stadium, effective for bonds issued after November 2, 2017.

No deduction for amounts paid in exchange for college athletic seating rights

The Senate Bill and the House Bill both would provide that no charitable deduction is allowed for any payment made to an institution of higher education in exchange for the right to purchase tickets or seating for athletic events.  These proposals effectively repeal the existing special rule that allows the purchaser to take a charitable deduction of 80% of the amount paid for the right to purchase the tickets.

© 2019 Proskauer Rose LLP.


About this Author

David S Miller, Proskauer, derivatives issuance lawyer, cross border lending transactions attorney

David Miller is a partner in the Tax Department. David advises clients on a broad range of domestic and international corporate tax issues. His practice covers the taxation of financial instruments and derivatives, cross-border lending transactions and other financings, international and domestic mergers and acquisitions, multinational corporate groups and partnerships, private equity and hedge funds, bankruptcy and workouts, high-net-worth individuals and families, and public charities and private foundations. He advises companies in virtually all major industries,...

Amanda Nussbaum, Tax Attorney, Proskauer Rose Law Firm

Amanda H. Nussbaum is a Partner in the Tax Department and also is a member of the Private Investment Funds Group. Her practice concentrates on planning for and the structuring of domestic and international private investment funds, including venture capital, buyout, real estate and hedge funds, as well as advising those funds on investment activities and operational issues. She also represents many types of investors, including tax-exempt and non-U.S. investors, with their investments in private investment funds.

Elizabeth Mills, Employment Attorney, Proskauer Rose Law FIrm
Senior Counsel

Elizabeth’s practice is focused both on health care organizations and tax exemption issues for not-for-profit organizations. She addresses regulatory and transactional issues for all types of health care providers, including hospitals, academic medical centers, large physician group practices, retirement facilities and health maintenance organizations. She advises these organizations as changes to their particular tax exemption standards are proposed, implemented, and litigated.

Steven Einhorn, Proskauer Law Firm, Tax Lawyer

Steven D. Einhorn is an associate in the Tax Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group. Steven regularly advises public and private companies with respect to employee benefits and executive compensation matters, including compliance with ERISA, tax, corporate and securities laws and regulations affecting employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements. In addition, Steven advises clients with respect to the employee benefits and executive compensation issues related to corporate mergers & acquisitions and other forms of...

Amy Zelcer, Proskauer Rose, Tax Matters Attorney, Litigation Lawyer, New York, Georgetown,

Amy Zelcer is an associate in the Tax Department.


  • Georgetown University Law Center, LL.M., 2014
  • Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., 2013 
    cum laude
  • Harvard College, A.B., 2007

Admissions & Qualifications

  • New York