April 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 107

Advertisement

April 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

U.S. Drops $562 Million Alternative Fines Act Allegation Against PG&E

Today, the United States requested permission to dismiss its Alternative Fines Act sentencing allegation against PG&E.  Under the AFA, a court can impose a criminal fine equal to twice the pecuniary gain to the defendant or twice the pecuniary loss suffered by victims.  Last September, the court dismissed the government’s loss-based allegations, finding that proving those allegations would be unduly complicated.  Today, the government gave up on the “twice the gain” allegation.  The result is a significant decrease in the potential fine faced by PG&E—down from $562 million to $5.5 million.

The government’s decision appears to be based on PG&E’s motion questioning whether the second stage of the bifurcated trial should proceed.  In its motion, PG&E pointed out that the government never put on its expert on the finance and ratemaking process during the guilt phase.  It is not clear why the government made that decision.  But the impact is clear—the jury has not been presented with any evidence on the complex practice of regulatory rate-making.  Even if the government had provided evidence on the rate-making process, PG&E made clear that surveying the various pipelines at issue, identifying which costs were forgone (and thus an unfair gain), and then figuring out which costs were passed on to consumers versus which costs become part of the rate base would be an uphill, onerous task for the second phase of the trial.

Faced with this proposition, the government blinked and dismissed the AFA allegations.  The jury is still deliberating PG&E’s guilt or innocence, but the costs to PG&E, if it is found guilty, just went down.

Advertisement
© 2021 Bracewell LLPNational Law Review, Volume VI, Number 215
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Kevin D. Collins, Bracewell, Government Investigations Attorney, Chemicals Sector lawyer,
Partner

Kevin is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Eastern District of Texas. He is a trial lawyer and has experience trying cases to jury verdict in state and federal court.

He also assists companies responding to government investigations after major industrial accidents and chemical releases in the energy and chemical sectors. Kevin has experience responding to investigations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Chemical Safety Board (CSB), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Pipeline and Hazardous...

512-494-3640
Advertisement
Advertisement