Skip to main content

February 6, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 37

National Law Review
  • Login
  • Mdn
  • FB
  • twt
  • link
  • home
  • rss
  • logo
  • Publish / Advertise with Us
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Join Our Team
    • Search
  • Trending Legal News
    • Most Recent
    • Legal News Podcast
    • What's Trending
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • NLR Blog
    • Search
  • About Us
    • About the NLR
    • NLR Team
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • NLR Thought Leadership Awards
      • 2018
      • 2019
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Search
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Search
  • Quick Links
    • Legal News Podcast
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Search
  • ENEWSBULLETINS

Error message

  • Warning: Undefined variable $settings in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).

1

New Articles
Bottom Row Image
Advertisement

February 05, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • Kerry Inc. Pleads Guilty and Agrees to Pay $19.228 Million in... by: United States Department of Justice (DOJ)

February 04, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • Increase in Large and Small Shareholder Activists by: Joel I. Papernik and Ivan J. Presant
  • New York Courts Continue to Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign... by: Shin Y. Hahn
  • 9 Famous and Groundbreaking Black Lawyers in History by: Sarah Bottorff

February 03, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • Preparing for New Consumer Privacy Laws in Colorado, Connecticut and... by: Elliot R. Golding and Kathryn Linsky
  • Cal/OSHA’s COVID-19 Prevention Non-Emergency Regulation Is Now in... by: Karen Tynan and Jennifer Yanni
  • Court of Chancery Holds That Corporate Officers Owe Duty of Oversight by: Nathan E. Barnett and Ethan H. Townsend
  • Illinois Supreme Court Rules All BIPA Claims Are Subject to Five-Year... by: Kevin M. Cloutier and David M. Poell
  • Regulatory Focus on Investor Side Letters by: Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • CMS Finalizes Long-Awaited Rule on Medicare Advantage RADV Audits by: Ankur J. Goel and Jeremy Earl
  • USCIS Starts Issuing 48-Month I-829 Petition Receipt Notices by: Luna Ma
  • NLRB General Counsel Seeks to Restrict Employers’ Right to... by: Juan Larios and Catherine Kang
  • Can a Federal Court Refuse Recognition of a Nondomestic Arbitral... by: Max B. Chester and Charles W. Niemann
  • Decathlon Wins Almost 3 Million RMB in Chinese Trade Dress Dispute... by: Aaron Wininger
  • Will U.S. Supreme Court Place an Undue Hardship on Employers When It... by: Stephanie L. Adler-Paindiris and Stephanie E. Satterfield
  • Beltway Buzz, February 3, 2023 by: James J. Plunkett
  • UK Regulation of Cryptoassets – Another Glimpse but Still None the... by: Judith E. Rinearson and Kai Zhang
  • NYC Council to Consider Expanding the City’s Pay Transparency Law to... by: Allan S Bloom and Evandro C Gigante
  • FRB Issues Policy Statement on Permissible Activities of State Member... by: Daniel Meade and Rachel Rodman
  • Listen to Your Critics: SEC Commissioner Considers the Future of... by: David A. Lopez-Kurtz
  • Illinois Supreme Court Rules Privacy Act Claims Have Five Year... by: Anne E. Larson and Harry J. Secaras
  • FTC Raises Threshold for HSR Merger Reporting by a Record $10.4... by: Timothy Z. LaComb
  • Attention New York Medicaid Providers: It’s Time to Upgrade Your... by: Carmen Jule and Jessica Sonpal
  • Bipartisan Bill to Ban Most Non-Compete Agreements Reintroduced in U.... by: Clifford R. Atlas and Erik J. Winton
  • OFCCP Identifies Contractors Whose EEO-1 Data Will Be Released on... by: Guy Brenner and Olympia Karageorgiou
  • ESG Litigation Update: Climate- and Carbon-Focused Litigation by: J. Michael Showalter and Jane E. Montgomery
  • Sixth Circuit Expands Retaliation Protections For Employees... by: Grant T. Pecor and Aaron Vance
  • USCIS Announces Extension of Validity of Certain Green Cards by: Alexandra LaCombe
  • Minnesota’s New CROWN Act Becomes Law: State Now Prohibits... by: Cynthia A. Bremer and Colin H. Hargreaves
  • Bankruptcy Court Finds Cannabis Employee Not Entitled to Chapter 13... by: Jane Haviland
  • FDA Announces Qualified Health Claim for Cocoa Flavanols in High... by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • EEOC Hears Testimony Concerning Employment Discrimination in... by: Jesse R. Dill and Simone R.D. Francis
  • Deploying A Holistic Approach to Automated Employment Decision-Making... by: Michelle Capezza and Corbin Carter
  • Robo-Rights: As AI Art Takes Over, Who's the Real Artist in the... by: Anthony V. Lupo and Dan Jasnow
  • FY 2024 H-1B Cap Initial Registration Period Will Be Open from March... by: Immigration & Compliance
  • US Executive Branch Update – February 3, 2023 by: Stacy A. Swanson
  • Revamping of Cosmetics Regulation and Safety by: John E. Wyand and Jennifer Tharp
  • Energy & Sustainability Washington Update — February 2023 by: R. Neal Martin
  • $31 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme Results in Two Convictions by: D. Jacques Smith and Randall A. Brater
  • Ten Minute Interview: Minority Direct Investments [VIDEO] by: Brian L. Lucareli and Glenn Singleton
  • New Year – New Hurdles by: Robert T. Dumbacher
  • GoodRx to Pay $1.5 Million in First Ever FTC Health Breach... by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • How Not To Get Your Start In Banking by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • SEC Commissioner Questions ESG Investing by: Jacob H. Hupart
  • Additional Nelson Mullins Alerts by: Nelson Mullins Government Relations
  • Europe: UK Regulator Issues New Recommendations to Firms on Consumer... by: Andrew J. Massey
  • Lohngleichheit bei Teilzeitbeschäftigung by: Dr. Thomas Gennert and Lisa Scheipers
  • All Things Chemical® Podcast: What to Expect on Capitol Hill and at... by: Lynn L. Bergeson
  • EPA Requests Nominations for SAB; Members May be Asked to Participate... by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • Pflicht zur ESG-Kundenbefragung gilt zukünftig auch für... by: Annabelle Juliette Rau
  • DOE Awards $118 Million to Accelerate Domestic Biofuel Production by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • Illinois Supreme Court Eliminates Possibility of One-Year Statute of... by: Nadine C. Abrahams and Jody Kahn Mason

Article By

Mia Farber
Scott P. Jang

Jackson Lewis P.C.
California Workplace Law Blog
Jackson Lewis Logo

Related Practices & Jurisdictions


  • Labor & Employment
  • ADR / Arbitration / Mediation
  • Litigation / Trial Practice
  • California
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Tweet
Advertisement

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Petition for Rehearing in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana

Wednesday, August 24, 2022


On June 15, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana that bilateral arbitration agreements governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) may require arbitration of California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims on an individual basis only.

In early July, Moriana, the named plaintiff-employee at the center of Viking River Cruises, filed a petition for rehearing with the Court. Moriana argued that the Court’s opinion went beyond the federal question presented and involved the unbriefed issue of state-law contract interpretation and statutory construction that exceeded the Court’s authority.

On August 22, 2022, the high court denied the request for rehearing and issued a final judgment, leaving intact the Court’s analysis of the severability language in Viking River Cruise’s arbitration agreement, as well as the Court’s analysis of statutory standing under PAGA.

While the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion is now final, the California Supreme Court has granted review in several cases pertaining to employment arbitration agreements and PAGA.  Through these cases, the California Supreme Court may shed additional light on when a plaintiff maintains statutory standing under PAGA.

The enforceability of arbitration agreements in California continues to evolve in other areas as well.  Notably, recently the Ninth Circuit withdrew its opinion pertaining to Assembly Bill (AB) 51 and granted a panel rehearing  of the appeal.  AB 51 is California’s law that purports to prohibit employers in California from requiring employees to sign as a condition of employment or employment-related benefits arbitration agreements concerning disputes arising under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act or California Labor Code. The Ninth Circuit’s move may indicate a likelihood that the Court will conclude the FAA preempts AB 51 in its entirety, potentially giving employers in California the green light to condition employment or employment-related benefits upon an employee’s signing an arbitration agreement.



 


Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2023National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 236
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Advertisement

Latest Legal News & Analysis

Kerry Inc. Pleads Guilty and Agrees to Pay $19.228 Million in Connection with...
The U.S. Department of Justice
Increase in Large and Small Shareholder Activists
Mintz
New York Courts Continue to Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Banks
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
9 Famous and Groundbreaking Black Lawyers in History
Lawmatics
Preparing for New Consumer Privacy Laws in Colorado, Connecticut and Utah
McDermott Will & Emery
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Can a Federal Court Refuse Recognition of a Nondomestic Arbitral Award Issued in...
By
Foley & Lardner LLP
Decathlon Wins Almost 3 Million RMB in Chinese Trade Dress Dispute for Store Design
By
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Will U.S. Supreme Court Place an Undue Hardship on Employers When It Decides Groff...
By
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Beltway Buzz, February 3, 2023
By
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
UK Regulation of Cryptoassets – Another Glimpse but Still None the Wiser
By
K&L Gates
NYC Council to Consider Expanding the City’s Pay Transparency Law to Mandate...
By
Proskauer Rose LLP
Advertisement

Upcoming Legal Education Events

How To…Comply with Obligations to Caregiver Employees
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Healthcare Fraud & Abuse: 2022 Year in Review
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
REACH 30/30 February 8, 2023
Wednesday, February 8, 2023
TSCA 30/30 Webinar - February 8, 2023
Wednesday, February 8, 2023

About this Author

Mia Farber Employment Litigation Attorney Jackson Lewis Los Angeles, CA
Mia Farber
Principal

Mia Farber is a principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and a former member of the firm's Board of Directors. She currently leads the firm’s California Class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) resource group. She has extensive experience in all facets of employment litigation.

Mia has represented employers in all types of employment litigation, including sexual harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination. She also has vast experience in the area of wage and hour class actions. Mia has defended a...

[email protected]
213-630-8284
www.jacksonlewis.com
Scott P. Jang
Scott P. Jang, Jackson Lewis, wrongful termination lawyer, unfair competition attorney
Associate

Scott P. Jang is an Associate in the San Francisco, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He represents management in all areas of employment law litigation.

Mr. Jang’s practice includes defending management in matters involving claims for breach of contract, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, and unfair competition. He represents clients in both class action and single plaintiff cases.

Mr. Jang is particularly well-versed in federal litigation. Prior to...

[email protected]
(415) 394-9400
jacksonlewis.com
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
National Law Review
  • Antitrust Law
  • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
  • Biotech, Food, & Drug
  • Business of Law
  • Election & Legislative
  • Construction & Real Estate
  • Environmental & Energy
  • Family, Estates & Trusts
  • Financial, Securities & Banking
  • Global
  • Health Care Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Insurance
  • Labor & Employment
  • Litigation
  • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
  • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
  • Tax
  • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
  • Coronavirus News
  • Law Student Writing Competition
  • Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs

 

As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.

Copyright ©2023 National Law Forum, LLC