February 8, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 39


February 08, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 07, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 06, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

As Use Of SPACs Increase $8 Million Settlement Cautions Due Diligence


Special Purpose Acquisition Companies obtain investor funds and then merge with a privately held company and take it public

The popularity of SPACs has increased exponentially over the past two years as a means of obtaining significant financial windfalls

As these transactions continue, executives and compliance professionals should consider conducting due diligence, following the SEC’s recent settlement agreement with Stable Road Acquisition Company, and other entities and individuals, for more than $8 million

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced, on July 13, that it reached a settlement agreement with Stable Road Acquisition Company and its CEO Brian Kabot, and Momentus, Inc. for more than $8 million in connection to a proposed merger and misleading claims about Momentus’ technology. The SEC is continuing an action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against Momentus, Inc. former CEO  Mikhail Kokorich.

This agreement highlights the need for proper due diligence and truthful statements to investors and the SEC, particularly as the use of SPACs as investment vehicles continues to increase.

Stable Road is a special purpose acquisition company, more commonly referred to as a SPAC or a “blank check company.” SPACs are created for the sole purpose of merging with a privately held company, which is then taken public with the expectation of investors achieving a significant financial windfall.

The SEC believed that Momentus and its former CEO, Kokorich, had made false statements about the company’s capabilities to provide space cargo services. The SEC found a number of additional irregularities in both companies’ disclosures, as well as in information provided by Kabot and Kokorich. 

Through the settlement agreement – at the time of which Stable Road had raised $150 million – Stable Road agreed to pay $1 million, Momentus has agreed to pay $7 million, and Kabot has agreed to pay $40,000. The merger is still scheduled to occur in August 2021, subject to additional regulatory and other approvals. 

“This case illustrates risks inherent to SPAC transactions, as those who stand to earn significant profits from a SPAC merger may conduct inadequate due diligence and mislead investors,” said SEC Chairman Gary Gensler in a rare public statement about the case and the settlement agreement.

The popularity of SPACs is at record levels. From slightly more than $13 billion raised from investors in all of 2019 to more than $110 billion to this point in 2021, SPACs are anticipated to continue grow in popularity. As the volume of such transactions increases, this particular case stands as an important reminder to company executives and compliance professionals that they should consider conducting thorough due diligence and ensuring the accuracy of statements made for purposes of soliciting investor funds. 

© 2023 BARNES & THORNBURG LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 202

About this Author

Ronnie Miller, Barnes Thornburg, Indianapolis and Washington DC, Labor and Employment Litigation Law Attorney
Of Counsel

Ronnie L. Miller is of counsel in the Washington, D.C., and Indianapolis offices of Barnes & Thornburg. A member of the firm’s Government Services and Finance Department, Mr. Miller serves as federal compliance counsel for government services and is also involved with professional responsibility and various legal ethics and conflict matters. He is involved in political law issues and advises clients on election and campaign laws, political action committees, and lobbying activities. Additionally, Mr. Miller is also a member of the Litigation and Labor and Employment...

Brian R. Weir-Harden, White collar defense lawyer Barnes Thornburg

Brian Weir-Harden focuses his practice on white collar criminal defense, internal and government investigations, criminal and civil antitrust law, and corporate compliance. A clear and concise communicator, Brian has an ability to identify critical legal issues and provide solutions while also helping to protect his client’s business interests.

Brian represents corporations and individuals subject to federal and state criminal and civil proceedings. He advises on national and international criminal antitrust investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)...