October 31, 2020

Volume X, Number 305

Advertisement

October 30, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Virginia Issues First COVID-19 OSHA Standard

Thank you to my colleague, Jonathan Schaefer, for his contributions to this post. Jon focuses his practice on environmental compliance counseling, occupational health and safety, permitting, site remediation, and litigation related to federal and state regulatory programs.

While Federal OSHA has issued numerous COVID-related guidance documents, it has declined to issue an enforceable COVID standard. Instead, OSHA continues to reference numerous other statutory and regulatory standards that potentially apply to what OSHA may determine are COVID-related deficiencies in the workplace.

Recently, the Commonwealth of Virginia took matters into its own hands and passed the first COVID-19 OSHA standard that codifies, and in some cases exceeds, guidance from OSHA and the Center for Disease Control. Virginia is a “state-plan” state, meaning it has been approved by OSHA to develop and implement its own worker safety and health program. Virginia’s actions may be a signal to the many other “state-plan” states to do the same.

Virginia’s COVID-19 standard gives much of what is found in OSHA’s guidance documents the force of law. It requires all employers to, among other things:

  • Assess the workplace for COVID-19 hazards and classify tasks according to the risk of exposure,

  • Develop and implement policies and procedures for employees to report COVID-19 symptoms,

  • Develop and implement policies for employees with a known or suspected case of COVID-19 to return to work,

  • Ensure that employees observe physical distancing,

  • Clean and disinfect certain workplace areas;

  • Control or close access to common areas, such as breakrooms or lunchrooms.

The standard makes it clear that cloth face coverings do not qualify as PPE, but it does require them in certain instances, such as when employees are unable to physically distance or when an employee is in a customer-facing job.

Employers with job tasks that are classified as “very high” or “high,” or employers with “medium” risk job tasks and 11 or more employees must also develop and implement a written infectious disease preparedness and response plan within 60 days of the effective date of the standard.

The emergency temporary standard, which goes into effect on July 27, 2020, will expire after 6 months.

Copyright © 2020 Robinson & Cole LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 206
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Megan Baroni Environmental attorney Robinson Cole
Partner

Megan Baroni has extensive experience counseling clients on a wide variety of environmental, health, and safety issues. She frequently represents manufacturers and distributors and is a contributing author to the firm's Manufacturing Law Blog, focusing on environmental, health, and safety trends that will impact the industry.
 
Environmental Compliance & Dispute Resolution 
Megan is a trusted advisor on complex environmental compliance issues, including the investigation, remediation, and redevelopment of contaminated properties;...

203.462.7528
Jonathan Schaefer, Robinson Cole Law Firm, Environmental Law Attorney, Hartford
Counsel

Jonathan Schaefer, a member of the firm’s Environmental, Energy + Telecommunications Group, focuses his practice on environmental compliance counseling, permitting, site remediation, occupational health and safety, energy regulatory compliance and siting, and litigation related to federal and state regulatory programs. His experiences enable him to work effectively with experts and legal counsel to help clients minimize risk and solve compliance, enforcement, transactional, and regulatory matters.

Environmental Counseling

...
860-275-8349
Advertisement
Advertisement