October 22, 2020

Volume X, Number 296

Advertisement

October 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 20, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

We Now Know That "Knowing" Requires Knowledge

Last month, I wrote about the Nevada Supreme Court's holding that a plaintiff must prove more than gross negligence to hold a director liable for breach of fiduciary duty.  Chur v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 136 Nev. Adv. Op. 7 (Feb. 27, 2020).  This should not be surprising to the Nevada legislature because it has provided in NRS 78.138(7) that directors and officers of Nevada corporations may not be held liable (with certain specific exceptions) unless the plaintiff proves a breach of fiduciary duty that involved "intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law."

This, of course, begs the question of what constitutes a "knowing violation of law."  In Chur, the Nevada Commissioner of Insurance argued that allegations of gross negligence sufficed to state a breach of the fiduciary duty of care involving gross negligence.  The Supreme Court rejected this argument and instead adopted the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals' definition in In re ZAGG S'holder Deriv. Action, 826 F. 3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2016).  Thus, a plaintiff must establish that the director or officer "had knowledge that the alleged conduct was wrongful" in order to show a "knowing violation of law" or "intentional misconduct" under NRS 78.138(7).

© 2010-2020 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume X, Number 69
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Paul Bishop is a partner in Allen Matkins' Corporate and Securities practice group, and works out of the Orange County office. He represents clients in a wide range of corporate transactions, including public and private securities offerings of debt and equity, mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests and tender offers, corporate governance matters and federal and state securities laws (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Act), investment adviser, financial services regulation, and California administrative law. He regularly advises clients...

949-851-5428
Advertisement
Advertisement